Importance of Fiduciary Principles to the Relationship Trustee-Manager Relationship

Posted on June 3rd, 2008 in Trust Funds | 6 Comments »

The conclusion from the foregoing discussion is that the trustee and the manager are not in partnership or in a general agency relationship. They are independent contracting parties to the unit trust deed. An examination of the terms of a typical trust deed of a non-authorized unit trust in detail reveals that the majority of the provisions are covenants made by either of them with unitholders or are provisions conferring powers or discretions on them by unitholders. When the regulations of the Financial Services (Regulated Schemes) Regulations 1991 are incorporated expressly into the trust deed of an authorized unit trust, it appears that they may be construed in the same manner. There are not many provisions that can operate as promises between these two parties.

Where provisions in the deed embody covenants made with unitholders, they can be enforced by unitholders as promisees. In respect of an exercise of power or discretion by the trustee which is without good faith or otherwise wrongful, unitholders can sue the trustee for breach of trust. In the case of the manager, unitholders may bring an action for an abuse of power on the basis of a breach of fiduciary duty. Thus, there is no problem of standing to sue for aggrieved unitholders. Read the rest of this entry »

Importance of Fiduciary Principles to the Relationship Trustee-Manager Relationship

Posted on June 2nd, 2008 in Trust Funds | 6 Comments »

The conclusion from the foregoing discussion is that the trustee and the manager are not in partnership or in a general agency relationship. They are independent contracting parties to the unit trust deed. An examination of the terms of a typical trust deed of a non-authorized unit trust in detail reveals that the majority of the provisions are covenants made by either of them with unitholders or are provisions conferring powers or discretions on them by unitholders. When the regulations of the Financial Services (Regulated Schemes) Regulations 1991 are incorporated expressly into the trust deed of an authorized unit trust, it appears that they may be construed in the same manner. There are not many provisions that can operate as promises between these two parties. Read the rest of this entry »

The Trustee-Unitholders Relationship: Custodial Agency, Bare Trust or Active Trust?

Posted on May 30th, 2008 in Trust Funds | 6 Comments »

A unit trust deed typically has provisions for (a) a primary trust to the effect that whilst the unit trust is a going concern the trustee will hold the unit trust assets for the unitholders ’subject to the terms and conditions of the trust deed‘ and, in the case of an authorized unit trust, ‘all regulations made under section 81 of the Financial Services Act 1986′ and (b) a secondary trust for realization of assets and division of its proceeds upon the termination of the trust by the trustee.There is thus no question that the trustee holds the assets in the capacity as a trustee of an express trust. However, it has often been said that the trustee’s function in a unit trust is merely to hold the trust assets for the unitholders and that it does not actively manage them like ordinary trustees. The question therefore is in what character does the trustee hold assets: a custodial agent, a bare trustee or an active trustee?”‘ Read the rest of this entry »

Splitting Powers of Management in the Unit Trust continue…

Posted on May 28th, 2008 in Trust Funds | 2 Comments »

In respect of the manager, the following functions and duties are conferred explicitly or implicitly by the statutory provisions or trust deeds:

(1) Dealer in units.

One of the attractions of a unit trust is liquidity. The manager has since the early days of the unit trust been the provider of a ready market for the acquisition and disposal of units of schemes under its management. Under the Financial Services (Regulated Schemes) Regulations 1991, the manager must at all times during the dealing day be willing to issue units and be willing to redeem units. Similar provisions may also be found in trust deeds of non-authorized unit trusts. Read the rest of this entry »

Splitting Powers of Management in the Unit Trust

Posted on May 28th, 2008 in Trust Funds | 4 Comments »

(1) Statutory Allocation of Powers and Duties

Against this background, a structure of dual administration in the unit trust is a logical step in the functional specialization of the powers and responsibilities previously found in the single person of the trustee. The unit trust was in the forefront of this development. The first regulation of unit trusts in the United Kingdom in 1939 made the trustee-manager structure a model for the management of unit trusts. This model was adopted by many statutes of common law countries and was followed closely by unregulated schemes. Read the rest of this entry »

Statutory Position of Authorized Unit Trusts

Posted on May 21st, 2008 in Trust Funds | 2 Comments »

Section 84 of the Financial Services Act 1984 provides:

Any provision of the trust deed of an authorised unit trust scheme shall be void in so far as it would have the effect of exempting the manager or trustee from liability for any failure to exercise due care and diligence in the discharge of his functions in respect of the scheme.

This section only applies to authorized unit trusts. Exemption clauses in non-authorized unit trusts are not affected. Read the rest of this entry »

Veto Powers

Posted on May 19th, 2008 in Trust Funds, swap | 1 Comment »

Under the Financial Services (Regulated Schemes) Regulations 1991, there are many situations where the trustee has to obtain the ‘consent‘, `approval’ or ‘agreement‘ of the manager, and vice versa. There are also provisions that require a party not to act without ‘consulting’ the other party.

For example, the manager ‘may instruct’ the trustee to create and to cancel units but the trustee may refuse to follow these instructions `[w]here . . . the trustee is of the opinion that it is not in the interests of participants‘. Similarly, the trustee may refuse to comply with the manager’s instructions to create units in exchange for assets if the trustee is not satisfied that there is no ‘material prejudice to the interests of participants or potential participants’. Read the rest of this entry »

Residual Management Powers of the Trustee

Posted on May 14th, 2008 in Trust Funds | 4 Comments »

It is established that the powers of the manager are not delegated powers derived from the trustee; the manager is a primary source of authority, having been responsible for the set up of the unit trust. However, despite this stated position, it is submitted that the trustee has reserve powers incidental to its status as a trustee by reason of its legal ownership of the properties and equity’s imposition of duties on such an owner. The position appears to be that if the manager cannot find authority for a particular act in the express or implied powers of the unit trust deed, the manager cannot do the act. The unit trust deed is the source of the manager’s authority. Read the rest of this entry »

France, Global Mutual Funds Investment

Posted on November 16th, 2007 in International Funds, Mutual Funds | 1 Comment »

France- the most important piece of legislation governing French mutual funds is its Law of 23 December 1988, an Act governing collective investment schemes, actually enacted by decree in September 1989. It replaced two 1979 Acts, which governed SICAV and FCP structures separately, with a single set of regulations, and implemented the 1985 UCITS Directive. Detailed regulations are set out in Application Decrees and Orders dated December 1998 and any points concerning SICAVs not covered in these laws are governed by general legislation, in particular the basic company law dated 24 July 1966. Read the rest of this entry »

Valuation, Pricing and Dealing - Dealing in The Shares or Units of The Fund with Investors

Posted on November 14th, 2007 in Mutual Funds, Trust Funds | 3 Comments »

Valuation

The value of a mutual fund depends on the prices or values of the underlying securities and other assets held by the fund. The manager must carry out regular valuations of the fund’s property, so that the prices at Which shares or units may be bought and sold can be calculated. Regulations usually prescribe how often Valuations must be performed. In the UK, for example, the required minimum frequency is twice each month The majority of funds are valued on a daily basis, but some managers prefer a weekly valuation, and some carry out more than one each day. Read the rest of this entry »

Mutual Funds Distribution Channels Guide

Posted on November 7th, 2007 in Mutual Funds | 1 Comment »

Shares in mutual funds can be sold directly by the fund or by its management company to investors, or through agents employed by the fund or management company as sales agents or representatives in a sales force. Managers may also sell funds through independent intermediaries acting either as agents for their clients or simply as selling agents who employ consultants to provide advice and support but selling directly to the public.

In the US, mutual funds typically sell their shares through a separate organisation known as a principal underwriter or distributor, and only in a few instances will the fund sell its own shares. The independent intermediaries are usually firms set up as broker-dealers. Read the rest of this entry »

Funds Investment Management

Posted on November 7th, 2007 in Equity Funds, General Funds, Hedge Funds, Money Market Funds, Mutual Funds | 1 Comment »

The investment management of a mutual fund’s assets is subject to compliance with the aims and policies stated in the prospectus (or equivalent offering document or explanatory memorandum) and to limitations imposed by regulations or, if more constraining, by the terms of the fund’s constituting deed or instrument of incorporation. This is the case if the investment management is carried out by the fund’s own sponsoring manager or management company, or by a third party appointed under contract to be portfolio manager or investment adviser.

Investors must be protected from unexpected and undesired changes in the purpose and practices of their chosen investment vehicle. Regulations therefore impose both a fiduciary responsibility and prescriptive rules on the operators of mutual funds to ensure there are no unauthorised or imprudent dealings.

Normally, investment is restricted to transferable securities that are listed on a recognised stock exchange, and, for funds that are to be marketed to the general public, investment in gold, oil, sugar and other physical commodities is generally not permitted but investment in property may be. The regulations usually reflect the general principles of collective investment, which are that the fund and its management should have the following characteristics: Read the rest of this entry »

Mutual Funds Info : Authorisation

Posted on October 24th, 2007 in Mutual Funds | 1 Comment »

In most countries marketing of mutual funds to the general public is permitted, but only of funds that have been authorised or recognised by the jurisdiction, or by a federated or affiliated jurisdiction. Even so, it may be possible to promote unauthorised funds to professional and institutional investors, or to people no longer living in the country /expatriates/.

CROSS-BORDER/ INTERNATIONAL MARKETING

The advent of the Internet has posed as much of a challenge to regulators as it has provided opportunities to fund management companies and their selling agents; but restraints on international marketing include: Read the rest of this entry »

Alexa CounterFeedBurner Counter