Pricing
When buying or selling either an open-end or closed-end fund, an investor usually knows the current value of the fund’s assets per share (NAV).
For example, to buy an open-end fund with a NAV of $15, an investor pays $15 per share. The fund simply issues new shares to the investor at the current NAV. The assets the fund manages have increased, but the value per share remains the same because the new shares have exactly the same value as the other shares. If the investor sells, he or she is paid the NAV. The amount of assets the fund manages has been reduced, but the NAV of outstanding shares has not changed because the shares redeemed were equal in value to all others.
With closed-end funds, the shares are traded in the open market and are consequently subject to demand/supply imbalances. They may trade at a price greater than their NAV (termed a premium) or at a price below the NAV (termed a discount). Read the rest of this entry »
In the common stock investment techniques, the most obvious hedging strategy might be to be long the stocks that are relatively discounted and sell short those that appear most overpriced. However, the process is not so simple.
Because of the composition of the Master List, the stocks as a group tend to do significantly better than the market as a whole. Consequently, although the long positions have significantly outperformed the broadly based market, the short positions, if sold, will likely provide lesser returns than the overall market.
It is because of the Master List’s positive bias that in hedging accounts Drach utilizes writing index call options as a substitute for the short side. This substitution both eliminates the effect of the Master List’s upside bias that would be experienced in attempting to short Master List stocks and provides added profitability for the short side because of premium capture. As discussed in Chap. 9, the method of going long the selected Master List issues and proportionately shorting (selling) index call options is a lethargic process, which has so far produced a constant annualized return of about 15 percent irrespective of overall market conditions. Read the rest of this entry »
Let’s illustrate the mechanics of a standard single-name credit default swap. Assume that the reference entity is the ABC Corporation and the reference obligation is the ABC Subordinated Debenture due 2110. The swap premium—the payment made by the protection buyer to the protection seller —is 550 basis points. If a credit event occurs, the protection seller pays the protection buyer the notional amount of the contract. In our illustration, we will assume that the notional amount is $10 million.
The notional amount is not the par value of the reference obligation. For example, suppose that a bond issue is trading at 73.53 (par value being 100). If a portfolio manager owns $13.6 million par value of the bond issue and wants to protect the current market value of $10 million (approximately equal to 73.53% of $13.6 million), then the portfolio manager will want a $10 million notional amount. If a credit event occurs, the portfolio manager will deliver the $13.6 million par value of the bond and receive a cash payment of $10 million. Read the rest of this entry »
