A Case in Search of the Trustee-Manager Relationship Principle?

Posted on June 1st, 2008 in Trust Funds | 6 Comments »

In Parkes Management Ltd. v. Perpetual Trustee Co. Ltd. , the manager of a unit trust was aggrieved by the trustee’s issue of a certificate that it was in the interest of the unitholders that the manager should be dismissed. On the question of the manager’s locus standi, Hope JA said:

It is submitted for the Trustee that it is only a beneficiary who can challenge the exercise by a trustee of a power . . . There would appear to be three answers to this submission. Firstly, that the Manager was a beneficiary; secondly, that the provisions of cl. 20(1) of the Deed entitled the Manager to ensure that the Trustee exercised any power under the Deed bona fide without indirect motive, and with a fair consideration of the issues; and thirdly that being a party to the Deed the Manager was entitled to challenge the certificate . . . Read the rest of this entry »

Splitting Powers of Management in the Unit Trust continue…

Posted on May 28th, 2008 in Trust Funds | 6 Comments »

In respect of the manager, the following functions and duties are conferred explicitly or implicitly by the statutory provisions or trust deeds:

(1) Dealer in units.

One of the attractions of a unit trust is liquidity. The manager has since the early days of the unit trust been the provider of a ready market for the acquisition and disposal of units of schemes under its management. Under the Financial Services (Regulated Schemes) Regulations 1991, the manager must at all times during the dealing day be willing to issue units and be willing to redeem units. Similar provisions may also be found in trust deeds of non-authorized unit trusts. Read the rest of this entry »

Unit Trust Delegation Must Know part B

Posted on May 15th, 2008 in Trust Funds | 4 Comments »

B. Permissive Delegation

This covers the situation where the trustee or the manager is given the discretion to delegate all or some of the duties and powers to a third party if it so wishes. In this sense, delegation permitted in equity or under the Trustee Act 1925 is permissive in nature.

For an authorized unit trust, the position is governed by regulation 7.15 of the Financial Services (Regulated Schemes) Regulations 1991. In general, subject to two broader categories of restrictions, and also subject to any restriction in the trust deed, both the trustee and the manager are permitted to delegate any of their functions to any person, including the trustee and the manager themselves. The delegation permitted by this regulation is not confined to ministerial acts but extends to any discretion. Read the rest of this entry »

Credit Spread Options Part 2

Posted on February 16th, 2008 in Credit, Stock Funds, swap | 4 Comments »

UNDERLYING IS A CREDIT SPREAD ON A REFERENCE OBLIGATION

When the underlying for a credit spread option is the credit spread for a reference obligation over a referenced benchmark, then the payoff of a call and a put option are as follows:

Credit spread call option:

payoff =

(credit spread at exercisestrike credit spread) x notional amount x risk factor

Credit spread put option:

payoff =

(strike credit spreadcredit spread at exercise) x notional amount x risk factor

The strike credit spread (in decimal form) is fixed at the outset of the option. The credit spread at exercise (in decimal form) is the credit spread over a referenced benchmark at the exercise date.

The risk factor is equal to

risk factor = 10,000 x percentage price change for 1-basis-point change in rates for the reference obligation Read the rest of this entry »

Interest-Rate Agreements (CAPS AND FLOORS)

Posted on February 16th, 2008 in Bond Funds, Loan Funds, Mutual Funds, bond, interest rate, swap | 2 Comments »

An interest-rate agreement is an agreement between two parties whereby one party, for an upfront premium, agrees to compensate the other at specific time periods if a designated interest rate, called the reference rate, is different from a predetermined level. When one party agrees to pay the other when the reference rate exceeds a predetermined level, the agreement is referred to as an interest-rate cap or ceiling. The agreement is referred to as an interest-rate floor when one party agrees to pay the other when the reference rate falls below a predetermined level. The predetermined interest-rate level is called the strike rate.

The terms of an interest-rate agreement include

  1. The reference rate
  2. The strike rate that sets the ceiling or floor
  3. The length of the agreement
  4. The frequency of settlement
  5. The notional principal amount

Read the rest of this entry »

Interest-Rate Swaps

Posted on February 13th, 2008 in Money Market Funds, bond, interest rate, swap | 4 Comments »

In an interest-rate swap, two parties (called counterparties) agree to exchange periodic interest payments. The dollar amount of the interest payments exchanged is based on a predetermined dollar principal, which is called the notional principal amount. The dollar amount that each counterparty pays to the other is the agreed-upon periodic interest rate times the notional principal amount. The only dollars that are exchanged between the parties are the interest payments, not the notional principal amount. In the most common type of swap, one party agrees to pay the other party fixed-interest payments at designated dates for the life of the contract. This party is referred to as the fixed-rate payer. The other party, who agrees to make interest rate payments that float with some reference rate, is referred to as the floating-rate payer. The frequency with which the interest rate that the floating-rate payer must pay is called the reset frequency. Read the rest of this entry »

LogoAlexa CounterFeedBurner Counter