There is no question that the distinction between this case and those cases where the retirement of trustees was with a view to purchase is a valid one. Implicit in this judgment is the recognition that there is no absolute rule against self-dealing. The willingness of his Lordship to look at the reality is consistent with the approach of the court in Holder and the recent application of the no-conflict rule in other contexts.
If the broader approach of Holder is adopted, it must be a question of fact whether a trustee in a unit trust can purchase. The court may take into account the fact the trustee does not participate in the decision to make the sale. Read the rest of this entry »
Pricing
When buying or selling either an open-end or closed-end fund, an investor usually knows the current value of the fund’s assets per share (NAV).
For example, to buy an open-end fund with a NAV of $15, an investor pays $15 per share. The fund simply issues new shares to the investor at the current NAV. The assets the fund manages have increased, but the value per share remains the same because the new shares have exactly the same value as the other shares. If the investor sells, he or she is paid the NAV. The amount of assets the fund manages has been reduced, but the NAV of outstanding shares has not changed because the shares redeemed were equal in value to all others.
With closed-end funds, the shares are traded in the open market and are consequently subject to demand/supply imbalances. They may trade at a price greater than their NAV (termed a premium) or at a price below the NAV (termed a discount). Read the rest of this entry »
All freely traded liquid markets share common traits related to psychological pressures (fear and greed), but each differs as to fundamental relationships, trading mechanisms, and structural factors. Each market’s individual characteristics must be understood. Once this understanding has been achieved, proper evaluation of similarities or differences, as well as interrelated pricing effects, with other markets can be accomplished.
One market that allows easy application of Drach’s common stock analysis is closed-end funds, also known as publicly traded funds or closed-end investment trusts (CEITs).
Although one of the oldest forms of investment, closed-end funds are among the most misunderstood and consequently often overlooked investment areas. Their origin can be traced back to the establishment of a Belgian fund in 1822; thereafter they flourished, particularly among English and Scottish investors in the latter 1800s. The first U.S. fund was formed in 1893 and, until the time of the stock market crash of 1929, closed-end funds were the dominant form of publically owned investment companies. Read the rest of this entry »
Management’s income is usually based on a percentage of the market value of the securities in the fund. The larger the asset base is, the greater the income. Both open- and closed-end fund managers are (at least theoretically) compensated to provide superior investment performance. If the value of the assets being managed grows, the management fees expand proportionately. In addition to pressures associated with performance, the open-end fund manager is faced with problems that can arise form variable capitalization.
Statistically, there is virtually no question that the popularity of both closed-end and open-end funds varies with market conditions. When the market is high, especially during periods of excessive speculation, open- end mutual fund sales increase (sometimes very dramatically), and there is an increase in the number of new closed-end funds. When the market is depressed, open-end sales decline (sometimes redemptions dominate), and there are few new closed-end funds formed. Read the rest of this entry »
Since almost all closed-end funds tend to sell at a discount, it can appear obvious that there is no reason to purchase closed-end funds when they are selling at a premium. Sometimes a special feature, for example, a closed-end fund having a private placement in its portfolio which is about to go public as a hot issue, may justify purchase at a premium. Otherwise, it is difficult to make a case for paying a price higher than NAV.
Central to the advantages of closed-end funds is the discount; both as to dividends and as to pricing variances. Read the rest of this entry »
Two things must be kept in mind when establishing a long position in this kind of hedge. First, since Treasury bond futures contractsrepresent face value of $100,000 worth of Treasury bonds, the investor will want to go long approximately $100,000 worth of closed-end bondfunds. When it comes to trading closed-end bond funds, I do not recommend buying more than 2000 or 3000 shares of a single fund for a short-term trade. That is why we would go long several different closed-end funds, representing positions of from $31,000 to $34,000 and amounting to approximately $100,000. That $100,000 long position offset the short position of 1 September U.S. Treasury bond futures contract at 100.18, priced at a 7.943 yield.
On February 10, 1978, with the Dow Jones Bond Average down to 89.79, two significant changes had taken place since we established our theoretical long and short positions: (1) The long positions in the bond funds had become profitable, and (2) so had the short position in the Treasury bond futures contract. For example, JHS was selling at 175/8, up from 167A; DBF was up to 165/8 from 161/2; and PAI had gone from 135/8 to 1334. The net asset values of all three funds had declined but the discounts, as predicted, narrowed more than the decline in net asset values, resulting in the profits. Read the rest of this entry »
In the common stock investment techniques, the most obvious hedging strategy might be to be long the stocks that are relatively discounted and sell short those that appear most overpriced. However, the process is not so simple.
Because of the composition of the Master List, the stocks as a group tend to do significantly better than the market as a whole. Consequently, although the long positions have significantly outperformed the broadly based market, the short positions, if sold, will likely provide lesser returns than the overall market.
It is because of the Master List’s positive bias that in hedging accounts Drach utilizes writing index call options as a substitute for the short side. This substitution both eliminates the effect of the Master List’s upside bias that would be experienced in attempting to short Master List stocks and provides added profitability for the short side because of premium capture. As discussed in Chap. 9, the method of going long the selected Master List issues and proportionately shorting (selling) index call options is a lethargic process, which has so far produced a constant annualized return of about 15 percent irrespective of overall market conditions. Read the rest of this entry »
Currency swap: Contract that commits two counterparties to exchange streams of interest payments in different currencies for an agreed period of time and to exchange principal amounts in different currencies at a pre-agreed exchange rate at maturity.
A currency swap has three stages:
An initial exchange of principal: the two counterparties exchange principal amounts at an agreed exchange rate. This can be a notional exchange since its purpose is to establish the principal amounts as a reference point for the calculation of interest payments and the re-exchange of the principal amounts.
Exchange of interest payments on agreed dates based on outstanding principal amounts and agreed fixed interest rates.
- Re-exchange of the principal amounts at a predetermined exchange rate so the parties end up with their original currencies.
- Again this may be done to hedge risk, to speculate on changes in exchange rates, or to attempt to lower the cost of borrowing by borrowing in the currency in which the most favourable interest rates are available and then swapping into the currency that the firm needs to carry out its business. Whether this will be cheaper will depend among other things on the bid—offer spread.
Read the rest of this entry »
A eurobond is a debt security handled internationally by syndicates, groups of bankers and/or brokers who underwrite and distribute new issues of securities or large blocks of outstanding issues. It is typically in bearer (non-registered form) and is issued outside the country of the currency in which it is denominated.
Borrowers and lenders are spread around the world, while the intermediaries are spread across Europe, with the majority of business being done from London. The market was founded in the early 1960s and has provided a competitive source of funding for borrowers who can tap discreet but important sources of finance. Japanese banks, pension funds and insurance companies have become important lenders in recent years and there are still plenty of wealthy individuals who prefer the anonymity offered by bearer securities. The eurobond market is the world’s second largest securities market after the US bond market in terms of trading volume and the third largest after the US and Japanese bond markets in terms of debt outstanding. Read the rest of this entry »
A major defence industry supplier, Death Mines plc, wishes to borrow £1 million for twelve years at a fixed interest rate to finance a new investment project. It could do so by issuing a straight eurobond but, as it is not well known in the market and does not have a high credit risk rating, would have to pay a coupon of 8 per cent which it regards as too high. The firm’s own bank is willing to lend Death Mines the required amount via a one-year floating rate note at a rate of 2 per cent over LIBOR, currently at 3.6 per cent.
Clearly, the floating rate loan is much cheaper at the moment, but LIBOR could easily rise over the period of the loan to such a level that Death Mines would finish up losing on the project. Thus, it enters into a contract with a swap bank, Border International, to pay to it 5 per cent on the principal, receiving in exchange LIBOR.
The position of Death Mines now is:
Pays to its own bank LIBOR + 2 per cent
Pays to Border 5 per cent
Receives from Border LIBOR
Net position — fixed rate loan at 7 per cent Read the rest of this entry »
The trade press within the industry where the commodity is important fans the fires of demand. Insiders begin to speculate. Word spreads to the financial community and press quickly. Sooner or later, the mass media carries a story. That’s when the average investor bids for a piece of the action, which usually signals a blow-off top. Prices crash.
At several points along the rocky road from bust to boom and back again, excellent trading opportunities present themselves. A technical trader watching a flat or stagnant price chart notices a slight uptrend. Perhaps the long-term downtrend line drawn earlier on the chart was penetrated. Or it might be a fundamental trader with informed contacts within the industry in question who hears talk of shortages, sees inventories decline, or notices price movements. This stimulates him or her to call some distributors, check import-export data, shipments, etc.—all the links in the chain from production to end use. Read the rest of this entry »
By far, the most popular type of credit derivative is the credit default swap. It is categorized as one of two credit default products. Not only is this form of credit derivative the most commonly used stand-alone product, but it is also used extensively in structured credit products such as synthetic collateralized debt obligations, which will be discuss later. A credit default swap is probably the simplest form of credit risk transference among all credit derivatives. Because of the popularity of credit default swaps, the other type of credit default product —the credit default option—is rarely used. Hence, we will not discuss that product here.
Credit default swaps are used to shift credit exposure to a credit protection seller. Their primary purpose is to hedge the credit exposure to a particular asset or issuer. In this sense, credit default swaps operate much like a standby letter of credit or insurance policy. In contrast, a total return swap allows an investor to increase exposure to a reference obligation. Read the rest of this entry »
Here we review some of the terminology used in the swaps market and explain how swaps are quoted. The date that the counterparties commit to the swap is called the trade date. The date that the swap begins accruing interest is called the effective date, and the date that the swap stops accruing interest is called the maturity date.
Although our illustrations assume that the timing of the cash flows for both the fixed-rate payer and floating-rate payer will be the same, this is rarely the case in a swap. In fact, an agreement may call for the fixed-rate payer to make payments annually but the floating-rate payer to make payments more frequently (semiannually or quarterly). Also, the way in which interest accrues on each leg of the transaction differs, because there are several day-count conventions in the fixed-income markets. Read the rest of this entry »
There are two ways that a swap position can be interpreted: (1) as a package of forward/ futures contracts, and (2) as a package of cash flows from buying and selling cash market instruments.
Package of Forward Contracts Consider the hypothetical interest-rate swap described earlier to illustrate a swap. Let’s look at party X’s position. Party X has agreed to pay 10% and receive six-month LIBOR. More specifically, assuming a $50 million notional principal amount, X has agreed to buy a commodity called six-month LIBOR for $2.5 million This is effectively a six-month forward contract in which X agrees to pay $2.5 million in exchange for delivery of six-month LIBOR. If interest rates increase to 11%, the price of that commodity (six-month LIBOR) is higher, resulting in a gain for the fixed-rate payer, who is effectively long a six-month forward contract on six-month LIBOR. The floating-rate payer is effectively short a six- month forward contract on six-month LIBOR. There is therefore an implicit forward contract corresponding to each exchange date. Read the rest of this entry »
Earlier we provided two interpretations of a swap: (1) a package of futures/forward contracts, and (2) a package of cash market instruments. The swap spread is determined by the same factors that influence the spread over Treasuries on financial instruments (futures/forward contracts or cash) that produce a similar return or funding profile. As we explain subsequently, the key determinant of the swap spread for swaps with maturities of five years or less is the cost of hedging in the Eurodollar CD futures market. For longer maturity swaps, the key determinant of the swap spread is the credit spreads in the corporate bond market. Read the rest of this entry »
A collateralized debt obligation (CDO) is backed by a diversified pool of one or more types of debt obligations (e.g., U.S. domestic investment-grade corporate bonds, high-yield corporate bonds, emerging market bonds, bank loans, asset-backed securities, and residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities). The funds to purchase the collateral assets are obtained from the issuance of bonds. There is a collateral manager responsible for managing the collateral of assets.
A CDO is classified as a cash CDO or a synthetic CDO. The adjective “cash” means that the collateral manager purchases cash market instruments. A synthetic CDO is so named because the collateral manager does not actually own the pool of assets on which it has the credit risk exposure. Stated differently, a synthetic CDO absorbs the credit risk, but not the legal ownership, of the reference obligations. A credit default swap allows institutions to transfer the credit risk, but not the legal ownership, of the reference obligations it may own. Read the rest of this entry »
A total return swap in the fixed-income market is a swap in which one party makes periodic floating-rate payments to a counterparty in exchange for the total return realized on a reference obligation or a basket of reference obligations. A total return payment includes all cash flows that flow from the reference obligations as well as the capital appreciation or depreciation of those reference obligations. When the reference obligation is a bond market index, the swap is referred to as a total return index swap.
The party that agrees to make the floating payments and receive the total return is referred to as the total return receiver; the party that agrees to receive the floating payments and pay the total return is referred to as the total return payer.
Notice that in a total return swap, the total return receiver is exposed to both credit risk and interest-rate risk. For example, the credit risk spread can decline (resulting in a favorable price movement for the reference obligation), but this gain can be offset by a rise in the level of interest rates. Read the rest of this entry »
The interest-rate swap was developed in late 1981. By 1987, the market had grown to more than $500 billion (in terms of notional principal amount). What is behind this rapid growth? As our asset/liability application earlier demonstrated, an interest-rate swap is a quick way for institutional investors to change the nature of assets and liabilities or to exploit any perceived capital market imperfection. The same applies to borrowers such as corporations, sovereigns, and supranationals.
In fact, the initial motivation for the interest-rate-swap market was borrower exploitation of what were perceived to be “credit arbitrage” opportunities because of differences between the quality spread between lower- and higher-rated credits in the U.S. and Eurodollar bond fixed-rate market and the same spread in these two floating- rate markets. Basically, the argument for swaps was based on a well-known economic principle of comparative advantage in international economics. Read the rest of this entry »
An investor who lends funds by purchasing a bond issue is exposed to three types of credit risk: (1) default risk, (2) credit spread risk, and (3) downgrade risk.
Traditionally, credit risk is defined as the risk that the issuer will fail to satisfy the terms of the obligation with respect to the timely payment of interest and repayment of the amount borrowed. This form of credit risk is called default risk. If a default does occur, this does not mean the investor loses the entire amount invested because the investor can expect to recover a portion of the investment. Read the rest of this entry »
