Principles of Trustee-Manager Relationship

Posted on June 1st, 2008 in Trust Funds | 5 Comments »

It is important, first of all, to define a fiduciary. Despite voluminous literature, there is no ready answer and the fiduciary relationship remains ‘a concept in search of a principle’. In general terms, it is possible to divide fiduciaries into two categories, status-based fiduciaries and fact-based fiduciaries.

The status-based category includes a core of well established relationships such as trustee-beneficiary, guardian-ward, director-company, principal- agent, solicitor-client, employer-employee, and partner-partner. They are relationships which are regarded by equity as fiduciary per se. It is debatable as to what is the common denominator behind these relationships but it is not a matter of concern here. Read the rest of this entry »

The Relationship of Unitholders INTER SE continue…

Posted on May 31st, 2008 in Trust Funds | 4 Comments »

By now, the law must have developed a distinct body of company law. The fact that two institutions have the same origin should not per se lead to the conclusion that the same body of principles applies. Brothers, despite their common parents, are not twins automatically. Directors’ duties, despite their origin in the trust, are not trustees’ duties. Latham CJ stated that ‘the power [to alter articles] must be exercised bona fide for the benefit of the company as a whole‘. Malcom CJ said: ‘It cannot be said that the alteration was made otherwise than bona fide for the benefit of the unitholders as a whole.’ The apparent similarity of these two formulations is deceptive. If the unitholders are not associating, as Smith v. Anderson has suggested, is it right to look at all unitholders as a whole? Read the rest of this entry »

The ‘No-Conflict’ Rule

Posted on May 26th, 2008 in Trust Funds | 4 Comments »

`It is a rule of universal application that no one having [fiduciary] duties to discharge shall be allowed to enter into engagements in which he has or can have a personal interest conflicting or which possibly may conflict with interests of those to whom he is bound to protect. Thus, the trustee or the manager is under a duty not to place itself in a position where there is an actual conflict of interests or where such conflict may potentially exist.

It follows from this general rule that a trustee or a manager must not enter into ’self-dealing’ transactions.” Except where market usage permits, the courts have never permitted a fiduciary, in the course of the same transaction, to approbate and reprobate on its undertaking by acting as a fiduciary on the one side, and as an undisclosed principal in its private capacity on the other. Read the rest of this entry »

Position of the United Trust Manager Powers and Investment Decisions

Posted on May 25th, 2008 in Trust Funds | 4 Comments »

Although the manager has extensive control over the ways that the trust assets are to be invested or dealt with, it is not a trustee. This is because the title to assets does not vest in it.

(1) Fiduciary or Beneficial Power Distinction

The first question is whether the manager’s power is a fiduciary power or a beneficial power for its own benefit. Scott and the American Restatement draw a clear distinction between such powers in the discussion of a private trustee being subject to directory or veto powers of others. It has been questioned if such a distinction exists in English cases. Indeed, judges in early English cases did not appear to be particularly concerned with enunciating such a principle. However, there is no reason to doubt that Scott’s position represents the English position as well. The early case Discconson v. Talbot supports such a proposition. So do cases on veto powers and some cases on powers of appointment. Read the rest of this entry »

United Trust Managers’ Contractual Relationship

Posted on May 22nd, 2008 in Trust Funds | 6 Comments »

As the manager is in a contractual relationship with the unitholders, it may have a contractual duty of care under the express or implied terms of the contract as contained in the unit trust deed. Historically, the court has chosen the contract as a medium of control over the conduct of people giving professional services. Invariably, the court will imply a duty of skill and care into a contract for professional services. However, as Deane J in Hawkins v. Clayton has reminded us, the preconditions for implying a term into a contract include that the term must be necessary for the efficacy of the contract, and the term must have been intended by the parties to form part of the contract. Read the rest of this entry »

The Rights of a Unitholder in Underlying Assets (the first proposition) (A2)

Posted on May 11th, 2008 in Trust Funds | 6 Comments »

The question before the court was the liability of the trustee to income tax on the interest. The relevant tax legislation made no provision for the deduction of tax from payments of income out of trust estates. The trustee argued, relying on Baker, that the liability to tax of income received by trustees depended upon the position as regards liability of the beneficiary; that in this case the interest received was treated as capital as a matter of ordinary principles of accounting between trustees and income- beneficiaries; that the beneficiaries would never receive the interest as income and therefore no liability to tax was possible. It was held by the Scottish Court of Session that on construction of the statute the interest was income and the trustees were the persons receiving or entitled to the income. Read the rest of this entry »

Mutual Funds Investors and Participants

Posted on November 11th, 2007 in Mutual Funds | 4 Comments »

Buying and selling

Although some funds are exchange-traded, the shares or units of most mutual funds are bought and sold by making an application to the manager. This can be in writing, by telephone or via the Internet, directly by the investor or by the investor’s adviser or agent. Many managers have pre-printed application and redemption forms and their advertisements and other promotional mailing material often include an application form. Once accepted by the manager, applications constitute a binding contract, and the manager issues a contract note stating the details of the transaction.

For purchases, payment can be included with the application. Some managers may insist on this for the initial investment of a first-time investor. Alternatively, the contract note will specify when payment is required. For large investments, the manager may be required by law to obtain confirmation of the investor’s identification and of the source or destination of money involved in the transaction: if there is any suspicion that the money is being laundered, or used to support terrorist activity, the suspicion must be reported to the authorities. Read the rest of this entry »

LogoAlexa CounterFeedBurner Counter