Let’s illustrate the mechanics of a standard single-name credit default swap. Assume that the reference entity is the ABC Corporation and the reference obligation is the ABC Subordinated Debenture due 2110. The swap premium—the payment made by the protection buyer to the protection seller —is 550 basis points. If a credit event occurs, the protection seller pays the protection buyer the notional amount of the contract. In our illustration, we will assume that the notional amount is $10 million.
The notional amount is not the par value of the reference obligation. For example, suppose that a bond issue is trading at 73.53 (par value being 100). If a portfolio manager owns $13.6 million par value of the bond issue and wants to protect the current market value of $10 million (approximately equal to 73.53% of $13.6 million), then the portfolio manager will want a $10 million notional amount. If a credit event occurs, the portfolio manager will deliver the $13.6 million par value of the bond and receive a cash payment of $10 million. Read the rest of this entry »
By far, the most popular type of credit derivative is the credit default swap. It is categorized as one of two credit default products. Not only is this form of credit derivative the most commonly used stand-alone product, but it is also used extensively in structured credit products such as synthetic collateralized debt obligations, which will be discuss later. A credit default swap is probably the simplest form of credit risk transference among all credit derivatives. Because of the popularity of credit default swaps, the other type of credit default product —the credit default option—is rarely used. Hence, we will not discuss that product here.
Credit default swaps are used to shift credit exposure to a credit protection seller. Their primary purpose is to hedge the credit exposure to a particular asset or issuer. In this sense, credit default swaps operate much like a standby letter of credit or insurance policy. In contrast, a total return swap allows an investor to increase exposure to a reference obligation. Read the rest of this entry »
Valuing Caps and Floors
The arbitrage-free binomial model can be used to value a cap and a floor. This is because, as previously explained, a cap and a floor are nothing more than a package or strip of options. More specifically, they are a strip of European options on interest rates. Thus to value a cap the value of each period’s cap, called a caplet, is found and all the caplets are then summed. The same can be done for a floor.
To illustrate how this is done, we will once again use the binomial interest-rate tree to value an interest rate option. Consider first a 5.2%, three-year cap with a notional amount of $10 million. The reference rate is the one-year rates in the binomial tree. The payoff for the cap is annual.
Exhibit 25-12 shows how this cap is valued by valuing the three caplets. The value for the caplet for any year, say year X, is found as follows. First, calculate the payoff in year X at each node as either zero if the one-year rate at the node is less than or equal to 5.2%, or the notional principal amount of $10 million times the difference between the one-year rate at the node and 5.2% if the one-year rate at the node is greater than 5.2%
Then, the backward induction method is used to determine the value of the year X caplet. Read the rest of this entry »
An interest-rate agreement is an agreement between two parties whereby one party, for an upfront premium, agrees to compensate the other at specific time periods if a designated interest rate, called the reference rate, is different from a predetermined level. When one party agrees to pay the other when the reference rate exceeds a predetermined level, the agreement is referred to as an interest-rate cap or ceiling. The agreement is referred to as an interest-rate floor when one party agrees to pay the other when the reference rate falls below a predetermined level. The predetermined interest-rate level is called the strike rate.
The terms of an interest-rate agreement include
- The reference rate
- The strike rate that sets the ceiling or floor
- The length of the agreement
- The frequency of settlement
- The notional principal amount
Read the rest of this entry »
In an interest-rate swap, two parties (called counterparties) agree to exchange periodic interest payments. The dollar amount of the interest payments exchanged is based on a predetermined dollar principal, which is called the notional principal amount. The dollar amount that each counterparty pays to the other is the agreed-upon periodic interest rate times the notional principal amount. The only dollars that are exchanged between the parties are the interest payments, not the notional principal amount. In the most common type of swap, one party agrees to pay the other party fixed-interest payments at designated dates for the life of the contract. This party is referred to as the fixed-rate payer. The other party, who agrees to make interest rate payments that float with some reference rate, is referred to as the floating-rate payer. The frequency with which the interest rate that the floating-rate payer must pay is called the reset frequency. Read the rest of this entry »
A total return swap in the fixed-income market is a swap in which one party makes periodic floating-rate payments to a counterparty in exchange for the total return realized on a reference obligation or a basket of reference obligations. A total return payment includes all cash flows that flow from the reference obligations as well as the capital appreciation or depreciation of those reference obligations. When the reference obligation is a bond market index, the swap is referred to as a total return index swap.
The party that agrees to make the floating payments and receive the total return is referred to as the total return receiver; the party that agrees to receive the floating payments and pay the total return is referred to as the total return payer.
Notice that in a total return swap, the total return receiver is exposed to both credit risk and interest-rate risk. For example, the credit risk spread can decline (resulting in a favorable price movement for the reference obligation), but this gain can be offset by a rise in the level of interest rates. Read the rest of this entry »
The Class B structure creates challenging financial issues for the fund sponsor This structure carries inherent risk in that the fund’s NAV could decline substantially, decreasing the amount of 126-1 fees and CDSCs received by the sponsor, possibly below the amount it advanced to the broker-dealer. This is especially a risk for an equity fund sponsor, since equity assets are more volatile than other asset types. In recent years, many fund sponsors have sought relief from the risk that the CDSC arrangement entails by taking advantage of new methods of financial engineering developed by banks and investment banks. These methods enable fund sponsors to reduce or eliminate this risk by securitizing and selling the future cash flows from 12b-1 fees and CDSCs. For example, consider a fund sponsor that has just paid a broker a 4% commission for selling Class B shares of a growth find. Rather than wait to recoup this commission via 12b-1 fees and/or CDSCs, the sponsor may sell the rights to these future cash flows to an unrelated party in exchange for a modestly lower payment today. This sale effectively protects the sponsor against the risk associated with a possible downturn in the equities market and consequential decline in cash flows from 12b-1 fees and CDSCs. Read the rest of this entry »
Greed is one of the most difficult sins to manage because it is always there. We invest to make money, and every promising investment raises the possibility of making a significant amount of money. We wouldn’t be human if part of us didn’t dream a bit about what might be. Good investors, though, keep that part of themselves in a controlled, isolated environment. If you are particularly vulnerable to the sin of greed, you’ll do likewise. Specifically, you’ll do some or all of the following:
- Invest slowly, knowledgably, and logically. Speed, ignorance, and reflex are the greedy investor’s enemies. Force yourself to move relatively slowly before making an investing decision, even when you’re certain that even a moment’s delay could cost you thousands. In the vast majority of cases, delaying your decision for a short period of time won’t hurt. In most instances, it helps because it gives you a bigger window of time in which you can think, reflect, learn, and talk about an investment. Greed preys on people who just react. When I say invest knowledgably, I mean do your homework. Learn about the fund’s or stock’s performance historically. Compare the fund or stock to the appropriate index or benchmark. Read as many reports as you can related to the investment. Don’t worry that your delay makes you spend an extra 50 cents a share because in the long run it won’t make a difference. Finally, logical investing means reasoning out your investment decision. When you hear a great tip or read something that makes you believe you’ve found a great fund that will make you millions, step back and write down the logical steps that have led you to this conclusion. Specifically:
Read the rest of this entry »
