In the spirit of politics, lawmakers tend to paint rival Social Security reform proposals in extremes: If one privatizesand another preserves, then never the twain shall meet. The polarized way in which proposals are debated, morethan the actual substance of the proposals, makes compromise difficult. However, compromise doesn’t have to be so daunting a task. Considerable overlap exists among reform proposals presented by lawmakers on both sides of the aisle. Agreement can be found in the following areas.
Save the Surplus
Democrats and Republicans began competing in 1999 to create the best “lock box” with which to protect Social Security’s surplus. Until then, it was common for Congress to allow deficits in other parts of the budget to exceed the size of the Social Security surplus. Read the rest of this entry »
To give you a sense of how fund shareholders are serviced, let’s follow a typical series of transactions beginning immediately after a prospective customer decides to purchase fund shares. In the first step, the customer completes and returns an application for opening a new account to the transfer agent. The application may be returned in a number of ways, including by mail, at a branch office (if one exists locally) or through the Internet. Once the transfer agent receives the application, the transfer agent determines whether it is in good order. Although the definition of “in good order” can vary somewhat among fund complexes, many core elements are consistent. The transfer agent always makes certain to obtain a social security number or taxpayer identification number (in the case of corporate accounts) for tax reporting purposes. The transfer agent also ensures that the initial funding amount complies with any account minimums specified in the fund’s prospectus. If there is any issue with the application, the application is considered to be “not in good order.” In that event, the establishment of the account and the purchase of fund shares may be delayed until the issue can be resolved with the customer. Read the rest of this entry »
The Class B structure creates challenging financial issues for the fund sponsor This structure carries inherent risk in that the fund’s NAV could decline substantially, decreasing the amount of 126-1 fees and CDSCs received by the sponsor, possibly below the amount it advanced to the broker-dealer. This is especially a risk for an equity fund sponsor, since equity assets are more volatile than other asset types. In recent years, many fund sponsors have sought relief from the risk that the CDSC arrangement entails by taking advantage of new methods of financial engineering developed by banks and investment banks. These methods enable fund sponsors to reduce or eliminate this risk by securitizing and selling the future cash flows from 12b-1 fees and CDSCs. For example, consider a fund sponsor that has just paid a broker a 4% commission for selling Class B shares of a growth find. Rather than wait to recoup this commission via 12b-1 fees and/or CDSCs, the sponsor may sell the rights to these future cash flows to an unrelated party in exchange for a modestly lower payment today. This sale effectively protects the sponsor against the risk associated with a possible downturn in the equities market and consequential decline in cash flows from 12b-1 fees and CDSCs. Read the rest of this entry »
Buying and selling
Although some funds are exchange-traded, the shares or units of most mutual funds are bought and sold by making an application to the manager. This can be in writing, by telephone or via the Internet, directly by the investor or by the investor’s adviser or agent. Many managers have pre-printed application and redemption forms and their advertisements and other promotional mailing material often include an application form. Once accepted by the manager, applications constitute a binding contract, and the manager issues a contract note stating the details of the transaction.
For purchases, payment can be included with the application. Some managers may insist on this for the initial investment of a first-time investor. Alternatively, the contract note will specify when payment is required. For large investments, the manager may be required by law to obtain confirmation of the investor’s identification and of the source or destination of money involved in the transaction: if there is any suspicion that the money is being laundered, or used to support terrorist activity, the suspicion must be reported to the authorities. Read the rest of this entry »
