Given that the primary obligation of a trustee is to hold properties belonging to others and to preserve them for the benefit of the beneficiaries, it is no surprise that trustees are generally expected ‘to use such due diligence and care as men of ordinary prudence and vigilance would use in the management of their own affairs’. When investing, they are expected ‘to take such care as an ordinary prudent man would take if he were minded to make an investment for the benefit of other people for whom he felt morally bound to provide’. This focus on integrity rather than ability ties in with the conventional wisdom that `[t]he importance of preservation of a trust fund will always outweigh success in its advancement’ . Read the rest of this entry »
- The trustee must not follow a direction of the manager if such direction is in breach of the express provisions of the unit trust. This is so irrespective of whether the power in question is beneficial or fiduciary. If it were otherwise, the duty of supervision would be completely hollow.
In respect of every investment proposed by the manager, this means that the trustee has to check each proposal against the letter of the unit trust deed. Read the rest of this entry »
A primary reason for discounts is a lack of sponsorship. If a securities salesperson (dependent on commissions) has a choice of selling someone an existing closed-end fund (say at a regular stock commission of around 1 percent) or a load mutual fund with a sales charge (that can be as much as 8 percent), the incentive is to direct “investors” to the open-end fund.
The incentives associated with higher sales charges can be easily observed when new closed-end funds are issued. In new issues, compensation is by underwriting fees. A typical fee is 7 to 8 percent. If a fund was coming public at $10 per share, an 8-percent underwriting fee would be 80 cents per share. Read the rest of this entry »
In the common stock investment techniques, the most obvious hedging strategy might be to be long the stocks that are relatively discounted and sell short those that appear most overpriced. However, the process is not so simple.
Because of the composition of the Master List, the stocks as a group tend to do significantly better than the market as a whole. Consequently, although the long positions have significantly outperformed the broadly based market, the short positions, if sold, will likely provide lesser returns than the overall market.
It is because of the Master List’s positive bias that in hedging accounts Drach utilizes writing index call options as a substitute for the short side. This substitution both eliminates the effect of the Master List’s upside bias that would be experienced in attempting to short Master List stocks and provides added profitability for the short side because of premium capture. As discussed in Chap. 9, the method of going long the selected Master List issues and proportionately shorting (selling) index call options is a lethargic process, which has so far produced a constant annualized return of about 15 percent irrespective of overall market conditions. Read the rest of this entry »
Valuing Caps and Floors
The arbitrage-free binomial model can be used to value a cap and a floor. This is because, as previously explained, a cap and a floor are nothing more than a package or strip of options. More specifically, they are a strip of European options on interest rates. Thus to value a cap the value of each period’s cap, called a caplet, is found and all the caplets are then summed. The same can be done for a floor.
To illustrate how this is done, we will once again use the binomial interest-rate tree to value an interest rate option. Consider first a 5.2%, three-year cap with a notional amount of $10 million. The reference rate is the one-year rates in the binomial tree. The payoff for the cap is annual.
Exhibit 25-12 shows how this cap is valued by valuing the three caplets. The value for the caplet for any year, say year X, is found as follows. First, calculate the payoff in year X at each node as either zero if the one-year rate at the node is less than or equal to 5.2%, or the notional principal amount of $10 million times the difference between the one-year rate at the node and 5.2% if the one-year rate at the node is greater than 5.2%
Then, the backward induction method is used to determine the value of the year X caplet. Read the rest of this entry »
In an interest-rate swap, two parties (called counterparties) agree to exchange periodic interest payments. The dollar amount of the interest payments exchanged is based on a predetermined dollar principal, which is called the notional principal amount. The dollar amount that each counterparty pays to the other is the agreed-upon periodic interest rate times the notional principal amount. The only dollars that are exchanged between the parties are the interest payments, not the notional principal amount. In the most common type of swap, one party agrees to pay the other party fixed-interest payments at designated dates for the life of the contract. This party is referred to as the fixed-rate payer. The other party, who agrees to make interest rate payments that float with some reference rate, is referred to as the floating-rate payer. The frequency with which the interest rate that the floating-rate payer must pay is called the reset frequency. Read the rest of this entry »
To give you a sense of how fund shareholders are serviced, let’s follow a typical series of transactions beginning immediately after a prospective customer decides to purchase fund shares. In the first step, the customer completes and returns an application for opening a new account to the transfer agent. The application may be returned in a number of ways, including by mail, at a branch office (if one exists locally) or through the Internet. Once the transfer agent receives the application, the transfer agent determines whether it is in good order. Although the definition of “in good order” can vary somewhat among fund complexes, many core elements are consistent. The transfer agent always makes certain to obtain a social security number or taxpayer identification number (in the case of corporate accounts) for tax reporting purposes. The transfer agent also ensures that the initial funding amount complies with any account minimums specified in the fund’s prospectus. If there is any issue with the application, the application is considered to be “not in good order.” In that event, the establishment of the account and the purchase of fund shares may be delayed until the issue can be resolved with the customer. Read the rest of this entry »
Client research by Benefits, Inc. shows that plan participants may be usefully grouped into three major segments based on their attitudes toward, and sophistication with, investment concepts. Plan sponsors should consider positioning options to relate to the needs of each segment.
Insecure investors usually compose the largest single participant group. These individuals describe themselves as “beginner” investors. They express a lack of confidence and understanding in matters related to investing and doubt their ability to accumulate enough assets to retire. Their lack of confidence has pushed them into relatively safe investment choices such as money market, fixed income and stable value options. They tend to be the least well diversified. Some avoid participating in a 401(k) plan altogether because of their lack of confidence. Read the rest of this entry »
The pricing and bookkeeping agent is responsible for maintaining the fund’s accounting records, pricing the fund’s portfolio each day, calculating periodic distributions, determining the fund’s cash availability, preparing financial statements and filing the fund’s tax returns. A fund’s accounting records are very similar to those of a small corporation, consisting of revenue, expenses, assets, liabilities and shareholder’s equity. The pricing and bookkeeping agent is responsible for maintaining these records each day. The accounting records are the basis for calculating the fund’s NAV, the price at which shareholders buy into and sell out of the fund, as well as for determining the distributions the fund makes to its shareholders. Read the rest of this entry »
Despite the huge growth of mutual funds, the marked shift in fund types and the creation of new distribution channels, the concentration of market share within the fund management industry remained remarkably stable during the 1990s. The industry has continued to be led by 10 fund managers with 45% to 55% of all mutual fund assets under management and 25 managers with 70% to 75% of all mutual fund assets under management. But many of the leaders changed places over the decade—some because of strong performances and others due to mergers and acquisitions. At the same time, the number of fund complexes overall has continued to increase as new fund managers have taken advantage of the mutual fund industry’s low barriers to entry.
1. Overall industry concentration and turnover In 1990, there were 464 mutual fund complexes, of which the top 10 managed 56% of total industry assets and the top 25 managed 76% of total assets. By the end of 2000, the mutual fund industry was modestly less concentrated at the top. There were 654 complexes at that date, with the top 10 accounting for 46% of total assets and the top 2, accounting for 71% of total assets.The list of top 25 fund complexes has changed significantly, with some complexes dropping out and others stepping in. Read the rest of this entry »
The Class B structure creates challenging financial issues for the fund sponsor This structure carries inherent risk in that the fund’s NAV could decline substantially, decreasing the amount of 126-1 fees and CDSCs received by the sponsor, possibly below the amount it advanced to the broker-dealer. This is especially a risk for an equity fund sponsor, since equity assets are more volatile than other asset types. In recent years, many fund sponsors have sought relief from the risk that the CDSC arrangement entails by taking advantage of new methods of financial engineering developed by banks and investment banks. These methods enable fund sponsors to reduce or eliminate this risk by securitizing and selling the future cash flows from 12b-1 fees and CDSCs. For example, consider a fund sponsor that has just paid a broker a 4% commission for selling Class B shares of a growth find. Rather than wait to recoup this commission via 12b-1 fees and/or CDSCs, the sponsor may sell the rights to these future cash flows to an unrelated party in exchange for a modestly lower payment today. This sale effectively protects the sponsor against the risk associated with a possible downturn in the equities market and consequential decline in cash flows from 12b-1 fees and CDSCs. Read the rest of this entry »
In addition, the composition of equity funds changed during the 1990-2000 period. According to Strategic Insight, broader investment objectives such as growth and growth & income experienced a decrease of 7.7 percentage points in share of equity funds during the decade. The decrease was offset by an increase in more specialized funds, with higher management fees, such as sector funds and international funds. In particular, emerging market and country funds went from a half-percent share of funds 110P available in 1990 to almost 3% in 2000. At the same time, there was a substantial increase in lower management fee products such as index funds, which were almost nonexistent in 1989.
2. Number of funds During the 1990s, fund choices grew alongside assets at a rapid pace as the number of mutual funds increased from around 3,000 to over 8,000.
Implications of this tremendous increase in the number of funds for management fees depend on the resulting trends in average and median fund size, as shown in Table 2 (which defines a fund to include each class of a multi-class fund). Read the rest of this entry »
1. Asset growth In 1990, the mutual fund industry was a relatively small industry among financial intermediaries, with just over $1 trillion in assets, or 12% of the total sector (see Table 1). By contrast, depository institutions had almost five times the assets, or 56% of the sector (of which commercial banks accounted for $3.3 trillion or 38%, and assets of life insurance companies equaled $1.4 trillion or 16%).
By the end of the 1990s, the mutual fund industry had become a major player among financial intermediaries, with almost $7 trillion in assets and 39% of the overall sector. Although mutual fund assets slightly lagged those of all depository institutions taken as a whole-at $7.6 trillion, Read the rest of this entry »
Lazy and indifferent investors need to force themselves to pay attention to their investments. If they just tell themselves that they’ll try and pay more attention, they are likely to fail. Typically, a slothful investor will experience an investing loss and vow to pay more attention and become more diligent. He may even make an effort to do so for a while, but the odds are that he’ll slip back into his old behaviors if his investments return to their normal performance. Investing laziness is a habit that’s tough to break, which is why my recommendation is to establish a new routine.
Here are the behaviors that you should incorporate into this routine:
1. SET UP AN E-MAIL ALERT
If you are managing your money yourself and buying individual stocks, this e-mail alert will automatically and regularly provide you with the earnings release of the companies you own. I monitor my personal holdings through a Yahoo! Finance page that tracks all my stocks and allows me to view headlines and news stories from the Wall Street Journal, Dow Jones, and other financial publications. Read the rest of this entry »
It’s likely that most investors, at some point in their investing careers, buy and sell much too quickly. Perhaps they get caught up in a market upturn or downswing or they are going through a difficult period in their personal lives and turn to day trading as a form of escape. If overactive trading is an anomaly rather than a pattern, then you probably aren’t guilty of this sin. On the other hand, if you find that you periodically fall into the habit of overactive investing, gluttony may be a problem you need to address. Read the rest of this entry »
Gluttons are addicts, only instead of being hooked on food they cravethe action of trading. While people who eat a lot may grow large, people who invest a lot often see their portfolios shrink. This type of investor sells bad stocks in the hope of finding good ones and sells good performers in the hope of finding better ones. Read the rest of this entry »
Several charges are associated with mutual funds, although they need not all apply to every fund. Charges are the costs that investors pay for the administration and management of their investment, applied in one of three ways:
- as part of the share or unit price paid upon entry to the fund;
- as a direct charge rendered separately from the amount of the investment;
- paid from the property (assets) of the fund.
Read the rest of this entry »
Each mutual fund has one or more investment objectives. For example, to provide an above-average and increasing income and a yield about 50% higher than the relevant index. It is the investment manager’s task to achieve these objectives, by pursuing a stated investment policy. Each investment management company will adopt an appropriate policy for each of its funds hut will tend to have an overall ‘house style’ or strategy. Two contrasting approaches are:
- Bottom up’. Known as stock-picking. The manager looks for outstanding individual companies. They can be identified from research reports or from personal knowledge of their products, services and management.
- Top<down’. Starts with asset allocation. The manager reviews world or national economy trends first, determines his asset allocation model in terms of geographic and industrial spread, then examines industries in detail and finally selects companies that will benefit from the trends.
Another contrast in styles between different houses is between passive and active management. passive management occurs when portfolio changes are made cannot be breached by the investment manager, Regulations usually will specify also that the investment objectives and policy as set out in scheme documents cannot be changed materially without approval by vote of the share- or unit holders. Read the rest of this entry »
The investment management of a mutual fund’s assets is subject to compliance with the aims and policies stated in the prospectus (or equivalent offering document or explanatory memorandum) and to limitations imposed by regulations or, if more constraining, by the terms of the fund’s constituting deed or instrument of incorporation. This is the case if the investment management is carried out by the fund’s own sponsoring manager or management company, or by a third party appointed under contract to be portfolio manager or investment adviser.
Investors must be protected from unexpected and undesired changes in the purpose and practices of their chosen investment vehicle. Regulations therefore impose both a fiduciary responsibility and prescriptive rules on the operators of mutual funds to ensure there are no unauthorised or imprudent dealings.
Normally, investment is restricted to transferable securities that are listed on a recognised stock exchange, and, for funds that are to be marketed to the general public, investment in gold, oil, sugar and other physical commodities is generally not permitted but investment in property may be. The regulations usually reflect the general principles of collective investment, which are that the fund and its management should have the following characteristics: Read the rest of this entry »
