Two things must be kept in mind when establishing a long position in this kind of hedge. First, since Treasury bond futures contractsrepresent face value of $100,000 worth of Treasury bonds, the investor will want to go long approximately $100,000 worth of closed-end bondfunds. When it comes to trading closed-end bond funds, I do not recommend buying more than 2000 or 3000 shares of a single fund for a short-term trade. That is why we would go long several different closed-end funds, representing positions of from $31,000 to $34,000 and amounting to approximately $100,000. That $100,000 long position offset the short position of 1 September U.S. Treasury bond futures contract at 100.18, priced at a 7.943 yield.
On February 10, 1978, with the Dow Jones Bond Average down to 89.79, two significant changes had taken place since we established our theoretical long and short positions: (1) The long positions in the bond funds had become profitable, and (2) so had the short position in the Treasury bond futures contract. For example, JHS was selling at 175/8, up from 167A; DBF was up to 165/8 from 161/2; and PAI had gone from 135/8 to 1334. The net asset values of all three funds had declined but the discounts, as predicted, narrowed more than the decline in net asset values, resulting in the profits. Read the rest of this entry »
Here we review some of the terminology used in the swaps market and explain how swaps are quoted. The date that the counterparties commit to the swap is called the trade date. The date that the swap begins accruing interest is called the effective date, and the date that the swap stops accruing interest is called the maturity date.
Although our illustrations assume that the timing of the cash flows for both the fixed-rate payer and floating-rate payer will be the same, this is rarely the case in a swap. In fact, an agreement may call for the fixed-rate payer to make payments annually but the floating-rate payer to make payments more frequently (semiannually or quarterly). Also, the way in which interest accrues on each leg of the transaction differs, because there are several day-count conventions in the fixed-income markets. Read the rest of this entry »
Nearly all of the mutual fund families offer multiple funds that are geared toward international investing. The different kinds of funds can be categorized into index funds, international funds, regional funds, country funds, emerging market funds, and global funds. International mutual funds have higher expense ratios than domestic mutual funds to cover higher trading costs and higher management fees. The funds also tend to have redemption fees to control frequent trading. Examples of funds offered by major mutual fund companies are given below.
* Index funds. These include Fidelity Spartan International Index Fund, Vanguard Developed Markets Stock Index, Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index, and Price International Equity Index Fund.
* International funds. These funds do not invest in the domestic market. Funds include Fidelity International Growth, T. Rowe Price International, Fidelity Overseas, Vanguard International Growth, Fidelity Diversified International, and so on.
* Global funds. These funds invest in all countries, including the domestic market, and include Templeton World, GT Global Worldwide, Dreyfus Global, Vanguard Global Equity, Price Global Stock, and so on. Read the rest of this entry »
In an industry that has seen its share of fads, Vanguard has long stood as a symbol of low costs and plain-vanilla products. Founded by John Bogle in 1975, the Vanguard Group is now the second largest mutual fund complex in the United States and has inspired a loyal following among many of its shareholders.
Low-cost funds have been Vanguard’s hallmark— and one of its main rallying cries within the industry. Its ability to provide funds with low expense ratios depends on the company’s unusual business model. In the Vanguard Group, the management company is actually owned by shareholders of its member funds. Read the rest of this entry »
The Class B structure creates challenging financial issues for the fund sponsor This structure carries inherent risk in that the fund’s NAV could decline substantially, decreasing the amount of 126-1 fees and CDSCs received by the sponsor, possibly below the amount it advanced to the broker-dealer. This is especially a risk for an equity fund sponsor, since equity assets are more volatile than other asset types. In recent years, many fund sponsors have sought relief from the risk that the CDSC arrangement entails by taking advantage of new methods of financial engineering developed by banks and investment banks. These methods enable fund sponsors to reduce or eliminate this risk by securitizing and selling the future cash flows from 12b-1 fees and CDSCs. For example, consider a fund sponsor that has just paid a broker a 4% commission for selling Class B shares of a growth find. Rather than wait to recoup this commission via 12b-1 fees and/or CDSCs, the sponsor may sell the rights to these future cash flows to an unrelated party in exchange for a modestly lower payment today. This sale effectively protects the sponsor against the risk associated with a possible downturn in the equities market and consequential decline in cash flows from 12b-1 fees and CDSCs. Read the rest of this entry »
In addition, the composition of equity funds changed during the 1990-2000 period. According to Strategic Insight, broader investment objectives such as growth and growth & income experienced a decrease of 7.7 percentage points in share of equity funds during the decade. The decrease was offset by an increase in more specialized funds, with higher management fees, such as sector funds and international funds. In particular, emerging market and country funds went from a half-percent share of funds 110P available in 1990 to almost 3% in 2000. At the same time, there was a substantial increase in lower management fee products such as index funds, which were almost nonexistent in 1989.
2. Number of funds During the 1990s, fund choices grew alongside assets at a rapid pace as the number of mutual funds increased from around 3,000 to over 8,000.
Implications of this tremendous increase in the number of funds for management fees depend on the resulting trends in average and median fund size, as shown in Table 2 (which defines a fund to include each class of a multi-class fund). Read the rest of this entry »
In addition to the influence of dominant local shareholders, the legal relationship between a company board and its shareholders may limit the rights of the minority shareholders. In general, under U.S. state corporate law, a company’s directors owe a fiduciary duty primarily to its shareholders. By contrast, in many non-U.S. legal systems, the board may be required to consider the interests of other stakeholders in the enterprise, including the company’s labor unions and local suppliers, as well as community groups and local government.The interests of these groups may, on occasion, come into conflict with the interests of minority shareholders. Read the rest of this entry »
In most cases, mutual fund advisers vote to support the recommendations of company management. This is true not only for management’s proposed slate of directors, which routinely receive the support of 99% of those voting, but also for management proposals on other subjects. For instance, during the 2000 proxy season, management proposals on proxy statements were supported on average by 85% of the stockholders who voted; proposals opposed by management were opposed on average by 74% of the stockholders who voted. This high level of consensus between stockholders and management is not surprising, at least for actively managed mutual funds. Owning the stock of a company ordinarily indicates a belief in the ability of the company’s management; supporting management’s position in voting matters often follows as a matter of course. Read the rest of this entry »
Investment advisers to actively managed funds devote tremendous resources to researching companies and industries. As part of that research, employees of such fund advisers meet regularly with company executives to discuss business results and trends. The analyst assigned to a company usually has detailed knowledge about the company’s business strategy and financial performance, as well as the quality of its management. Read the rest of this entry »
Anger becomes a deadly investing sin when it isn’t managed. Anger in itself isn’t a problem; the actions it prompts you to take, though, can cause major losses. To help you prevent these losses, here are two sets of tips. The first relates to monitoring your investing moods; the second involves avoiding specific, anger-induced investing mistakes.
Mood Monitor
If you’re vulnerable to the sin of wrath, you need to be vigilant for signs of anger in all its forms when you’re contemplating your investments. Be alert for the following emotions and take the suggested precautions if you spot them:
1. A red-hot desire for vengeance. You want revenge against the market in general or a broker who you feel gave you bad advice or the media for ruining a great investment. When you’re contemplating a given investment, all you can think about is how the “enemy” will rue the day they crossed you. Your goal is not financial as much as it is that sweet feeling of defeating your adversary. Read the rest of this entry »
To a certain extent, all investors react to good or bad news regarding the market. Investing gluttons, however, overreact. They are so hungry for action, they respond to the rumor of a merger or the hint of regulatory move by buying and selling. They become so worked up at the hint of bad news involving a stock they’re holding that they reflexively sell; they become so eager for profit at possible good news that they immediately buy.
The irony is that these gluttons think they’re getting a jump on the market, but in reality, they’re lagging behind it. Stocks can often move before the first trade by 5 percent on good or bad news. As a result, investors that use good or bad news as a trigger for a trade usually are dealing with unfavorable price movement. They deceive themselves into thinking that by reacting quickly to a news report about a stock or a broader economic trend, they are going to get a jump on other investors. In reality, they are lagging behind the market as well as other investors who make less frequent but more strategic investing decisions. Read the rest of this entry »
In other words, don’t worship profits and take them just because you have them. As tempting as it is to book a profit when stocks do well, many times it’s wiser to hold on to the stock and wait for its price to rise further over time. Before making a decision, examine the company before you bought it, look at what has transpired since, and then ask yourself the following questions:
Have the earnings grown faster than market expectations?
Has there been some positive event that may allow for greater growth in the future?
Be aware, too, that if you have held the stock for months or even years without much positive movement and it suddenly shoots up, your temptation will be to sell in what seems an anomalous period. Before selling, though, do your research and see if this really is anomaly or if it is just the start of a longer-lasting upward trend.
I remember buying Cummins, Inc. (CMI), an Indiana-based engine manufacturer, at $32 in 2001. The company was experiencing a slowdown in sales and earnings were declining. The stock struggled, bottomed out at $20 and finally recovered to the upper $30s by the middle of 2004. Relieved that the stock had made a respectable comeback, I sold at $39 and made a modest profit. What I failed to do was track a clear change in the sales and profit momentum of the company. My avarice got the better of me. If I had waited until late 2006, I would have seen the stock climb to $100 as earnings were poised to exceed $10 per share for the year.
If you’re an investing glutton or driven by lust, you’re likely to act first and ask questions later. While certain situations may call for immediate investing action, most require contemplation and investigation before making a decision. At some point, you probably bought a stock without knowing all the metrics, such as price-to-earning ratio, price to sales, cash flow, and book value. You’ve probably also bought a mutual fund without being aware of all the fees involved. You may have been so anxious to purchase a stock on the upswing that you failed to learn much about the company, including who the CEO is, the company’s products and services, its performance over the past year, and so on.
In almost all of these instances, you probably regretted your investment.
For long-term investors, slow is almost always better than fast. To remind yourself of this fact, consider the following scenario. You decide you want to buy the S&P 100 because you’re convinced that it’s going to do very well in the coming year. You’re well aware that it has increased in value significantly in the last week, and you want to make the investment before it goes too much higher. Your investment advisor tells you about a fund with a good reputation, North Track S&P 100 Index Fund (SPPCX).
The fund charges 1.88 percent annually or $188 per $10,000 invested. At first that rate sounds reasonable, and in your rush to invest, you may not investigate other funds and their charges. If this were the case, you might miss the S&P 100 Trust (OEF) that only charges .20 percent annually or $20 per $10,000 invested. If you assume the S&P 100 appreciates just 6 percent per annum, and you invest $10,000 per year, the difference in fees alone will amount to over $10,000 at the end of ten years.
The good news about this investing sin is that you have a number of ways to reduce its negative impact. Here are some steps you can take to reduce your gluttony and find a more healthy balance between active trading and watchful waiting:
A. Reserve 5 to 10 percent of your portfolio for aggressive trading.
Just as a diet isn’t designed to eliminate all food—or even all junky food—a good regimen for the investing glutton isn’t to cut trading entirely. For whatever reason, you enjoy and need the action of buying and selling. What you don’t need is for this need to eat away at your portfolio. Therefore, reserve a small percentage to feed this habit. If you only actively trade 100 shares instead of 1,000, you probably won’t do much damage.
Remember, though, that this 10 percent high-end percentage is absolute! Invariably, a time will come when the actively traded 10 percent will be performing well, and the inner glutton’s voice will say, “Don’t be a sucker; you’re a much better investor now than before; up the percentage to 20 percent?’ Do not heed this voice. It is the same voice the dieter hears after losing ten pounds, the voice that says, “Another slice of chocolate cake won’t hurt you? Read the rest of this entry »
Certain types of investing seem to trigger anger in certain investors, and if you’re vulnerable to this sin, you should do everything possible to avoid these types. Specifically, don’t:
-
Some investors experience significant losses but take counterproductive actions in the wake of these losses. Rather than becoming aware of how their sins created their investing woes, they allow sloth and pride to cloud their vision, shielding them from the truth about the mistakes they have made. Read the rest of this entry »
