Funds Investing

Whatever the explanation for the forward rate bias and whatever the reason for its persistence, we hope that the forward rate bias will continue to exist well into the future. Armed with this evidence, how can tradable profits be realized? The easiest way to trade the forward rate bias is to use currency futures. Futures contracts can be easily bought or short-sold, are easy to cancel, and have low trading costs. On the other hand, forward contracts are restrictive and difficult to cancel. The pricing of forward contracts and futures contracts is almost identical, so the trading profits will also be equivalent. The trading strategy consists of buying the currency with the highest interest rate and unwinding the position a month later. A one-month holding period is chosen because the forward rate bias is most prominent for shorter periods. The following steps are taken in choosing and executing the strategy. Read the rest of this entry »

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The primary purpose of regulations is to protect investors, and the roots of governmental regulation of mutual funds in the longer-established markets are often associated with major scandals and market crashes.

In the USA, the stock market crash of 1929 prompted an extensive investigation by Congress into the securities industry. It revealed that overselling, or ‘ramming’ of shares, particularly radio company shares, had created unrealistic expectations and false, overvalued markets. The investigation resulted finally in the Investment Company Act 1940, which established the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) - this Act remains the cornerstone of US mutual fund regulation - and the Investment Advisers Act 1940. Along with two Acts passed into Federal law in the 1930s - the Securities Act 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act 2934 - these four Acts provide the bulk of federal powers over the activities of US investment companies. In fact, the only addition to US legislation affecting all companies since 1940 is the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and that has only an indirect bearing on mutual funds themselves, being more concerned with accounting, auditing and disclosure practices of trading companies, following the Enron and Worldcom scandals. Read the rest of this entry »