In determining which specific closed-end fund provides the best buying opportunity, it might appear that the process is exceptionally simple: Just see which one is selling at the widest discount and buy it.
Unfortunately, the process is a bit more complicated. As previously discussed, there are valid reasons for discounts. There is also a wide variety of fund types: equity (stocks in general or in industrial sectors), bonds (different types, such as municipal, corporate, foreign, or U.S. government; all with varying maturities), convertible bonds (combining both bond and stock characteristics), specialty (confining interest to a specific country, a very narrow industry sector, venture capital, or specific private placements), dual-purpose (where the fund seeks both capital gains and income), or anything else that can generate public interest and enough sales to capitalize the fund. Read the rest of this entry »
A primary reason for discounts is a lack of sponsorship. If a securities salesperson (dependent on commissions) has a choice of selling someone an existing closed-end fund (say at a regular stock commission of around 1 percent) or a load mutual fund with a sales charge (that can be as much as 8 percent), the incentive is to direct “investors” to the open-end fund.
The incentives associated with higher sales charges can be easily observed when new closed-end funds are issued. In new issues, compensation is by underwriting fees. A typical fee is 7 to 8 percent. If a fund was coming public at $10 per share, an 8-percent underwriting fee would be 80 cents per share. Read the rest of this entry »
In the published common stock portfolio modeling the Continuous Full Investment portfolio models were included to function as a control to allow objective comparisons with the market timing models.
Although intended as a control, allowing demonstration of the validity of the timing technique, the Continuous Models have significantly outperformed the broadly based popularized market averages. The reasons for this superior performance are twofold. First, the rigid requirements for stocks to qualify for the Master List results in the stocks comprising the Continuous Models to be of usually superior fundamental quality, thereby giving the group an upward bias relative to the overall market. Second, the Continuous Models change positions in a gradual, relatively slow process in which new positions are selected that are among the most discounted (low-priced relative to the others) on the list. In effect, a rotational process adds those that have become more discounted and deletes those less discounted. Read the rest of this entry »
Two things must be kept in mind when establishing a long position in this kind of hedge. First, since Treasury bond futures contractsrepresent face value of $100,000 worth of Treasury bonds, the investor will want to go long approximately $100,000 worth of closed-end bondfunds. When it comes to trading closed-end bond funds, I do not recommend buying more than 2000 or 3000 shares of a single fund for a short-term trade. That is why we would go long several different closed-end funds, representing positions of from $31,000 to $34,000 and amounting to approximately $100,000. That $100,000 long position offset the short position of 1 September U.S. Treasury bond futures contract at 100.18, priced at a 7.943 yield.
On February 10, 1978, with the Dow Jones Bond Average down to 89.79, two significant changes had taken place since we established our theoretical long and short positions: (1) The long positions in the bond funds had become profitable, and (2) so had the short position in the Treasury bond futures contract. For example, JHS was selling at 175/8, up from 167A; DBF was up to 165/8 from 161/2; and PAI had gone from 135/8 to 1334. The net asset values of all three funds had declined but the discounts, as predicted, narrowed more than the decline in net asset values, resulting in the profits. Read the rest of this entry »
In the common stock investment techniques, the most obvious hedging strategy might be to be long the stocks that are relatively discounted and sell short those that appear most overpriced. However, the process is not so simple.
Because of the composition of the Master List, the stocks as a group tend to do significantly better than the market as a whole. Consequently, although the long positions have significantly outperformed the broadly based market, the short positions, if sold, will likely provide lesser returns than the overall market.
It is because of the Master List’s positive bias that in hedging accounts Drach utilizes writing index call options as a substitute for the short side. This substitution both eliminates the effect of the Master List’s upside bias that would be experienced in attempting to short Master List stocks and provides added profitability for the short side because of premium capture. As discussed in Chap. 9, the method of going long the selected Master List issues and proportionately shorting (selling) index call options is a lethargic process, which has so far produced a constant annualized return of about 15 percent irrespective of overall market conditions. Read the rest of this entry »
Currency swap: Contract that commits two counterparties to exchange streams of interest payments in different currencies for an agreed period of time and to exchange principal amounts in different currencies at a pre-agreed exchange rate at maturity.
A currency swap has three stages:
An initial exchange of principal: the two counterparties exchange principal amounts at an agreed exchange rate. This can be a notional exchange since its purpose is to establish the principal amounts as a reference point for the calculation of interest payments and the re-exchange of the principal amounts.
Exchange of interest payments on agreed dates based on outstanding principal amounts and agreed fixed interest rates.
- Re-exchange of the principal amounts at a predetermined exchange rate so the parties end up with their original currencies.
- Again this may be done to hedge risk, to speculate on changes in exchange rates, or to attempt to lower the cost of borrowing by borrowing in the currency in which the most favourable interest rates are available and then swapping into the currency that the firm needs to carry out its business. Whether this will be cheaper will depend among other things on the bid—offer spread.
Read the rest of this entry »
Realistically, greed is such a powerful force at times that it’s difficult to find that coolly rational place that allows you to stop your investing reflex. You come across a stock that you’re convinced is going to take off, and you feel every second you delay represents many dollars lost. In these situations, it’s all you can do not to sell the house and use the proceeds for this investment.
Developing a disciplined mindset can help you deal with these tempting situations. By disciplined, I mean you must be in a highly conscious, analytical state when you make an investment decision. Even as your greed is pushing you to rush forward or buy more, your discipline provides you with more rational alternatives. How do you develop discipline? I’ve suggested a few techniques earlier, such as imposing a 5 percent limit and gathering sufficient information before acting. Here are some additional ways to do so:
-
USE A METHOD OR A PROCESS BEFORE MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION
Whether it’s going through a mental checklist of things you need to do before taking action or employing a series of questions that must be answered to your satisfaction, a process ensures that you won’t act based only on an overwhelming desire to make money quickly. Read the rest of this entry »
Here the problem is lusting after a given investment even before it has proven its worth. For many reasons, people get it in their heads that a stock or fund is going to take off, and they buy too much too quickly. It is like falling in love at first sight. Suddenly, they have a singular focus and ignore everyone and every thing besides this one object of lust.
For instance, you subscribe to an investment newsletter, and you swear by it. In recent months, it has been right on the money with its recommendations, and it seems as if the newsletter author has the inside track on the market. Perhaps you recall George Gilder and hi Gilder Technology Report. People made a great deal of money in the late 1990s investing in the tech companies Gilder recommended. In fact, hi; picks were like self-fulfilling prophecies: If George picked it, the stock would invariably rise. Of course, by late 2000 just about all the tech stocks went down and people who took Gilder’s recommendations as gospel lost a lot of money. Read the rest of this entry »
Lazy and indifferent investors need to force themselves to pay attention to their investments. If they just tell themselves that they’ll try and pay more attention, they are likely to fail. Typically, a slothful investor will experience an investing loss and vow to pay more attention and become more diligent. He may even make an effort to do so for a while, but the odds are that he’ll slip back into his old behaviors if his investments return to their normal performance. Investing laziness is a habit that’s tough to break, which is why my recommendation is to establish a new routine.
Here are the behaviors that you should incorporate into this routine:
1. SET UP AN E-MAIL ALERT
If you are managing your money yourself and buying individual stocks, this e-mail alert will automatically and regularly provide you with the earnings release of the companies you own. I monitor my personal holdings through a Yahoo! Finance page that tracks all my stocks and allows me to view headlines and news stories from the Wall Street Journal, Dow Jones, and other financial publications. Read the rest of this entry »
Gluttons are addicts, only instead of being hooked on food they cravethe action of trading. While people who eat a lot may grow large, people who invest a lot often see their portfolios shrink. This type of investor sells bad stocks in the hope of finding good ones and sells good performers in the hope of finding better ones. Read the rest of this entry »
Given the previous commandment, I would be the last person to predict the market’s direction in the coming years. What seems reasonably safe to assume, however, is that we will see a market that reflects the fast-changing, world-shaking events of our era. I don’t believe I’m going out on a limb when I suggest that the market is going to be full of surprises, that stocks everyone believed would do well will experience sudden downturns and stocks that no one had high expectations for will become big winners. Funds that have performed well for years will slide down a notch and turn in mediocre performances, and a little-known fund will become the hottest one on the Street. Read the rest of this entry »
Mutual funds are used by private investors and by institutions for different but overlapping reasons
Private investors use mutual funds to invest money in the hope that it will:
- grow in value, or
- provide income, or
- deliver both, i.e.. capital growth and income either to serve specific financial needs, now or in the future, or simply to enhance their prospect of wealth.
Institutions, particularly life companies and pensions funds, use mutual funds as a convenient way to organise and manage some if not all of their investment portfolios, which will have objectives similar to those of the private investors who are the ultimate beneficiaries. Read the rest of this entry »
Spain - a new Mutual Fund Law, the ‘CIF Law‘ (35/2003), implemented the expansion of the UNITS Directive and effectively established hedge funds; prior to this, the principal legislation was the Lee de Institutions ones de Inversion Colectiva of 1984 and the Real Decorate de Instituciones de Inversion Collective of 1990, amended in February 2001. Supervisory responsibility is vested in the CNMV - Comision Nacional den Mercado de Valor’s, established by the Securities Market Law which was updated by Law 37/1998. Unusually, there are no institutional funds in Spain but this may change as CNMV’s circular of 3 May 2006 issued rules for hedge funds. Read the rest of this entry »
Each mutual fund has one or more investment objectives. For example, to provide an above-average and increasing income and a yield about 50% higher than the relevant index. It is the investment manager’s task to achieve these objectives, by pursuing a stated investment policy. Each investment management company will adopt an appropriate policy for each of its funds hut will tend to have an overall ‘house style’ or strategy. Two contrasting approaches are:
- Bottom up’. Known as stock-picking. The manager looks for outstanding individual companies. They can be identified from research reports or from personal knowledge of their products, services and management.
- Top<down’. Starts with asset allocation. The manager reviews world or national economy trends first, determines his asset allocation model in terms of geographic and industrial spread, then examines industries in detail and finally selects companies that will benefit from the trends.
Another contrast in styles between different houses is between passive and active management. passive management occurs when portfolio changes are made cannot be breached by the investment manager, Regulations usually will specify also that the investment objectives and policy as set out in scheme documents cannot be changed materially without approval by vote of the share- or unit holders. Read the rest of this entry »
The investment management of a mutual fund’s assets is subject to compliance with the aims and policies stated in the prospectus (or equivalent offering document or explanatory memorandum) and to limitations imposed by regulations or, if more constraining, by the terms of the fund’s constituting deed or instrument of incorporation. This is the case if the investment management is carried out by the fund’s own sponsoring manager or management company, or by a third party appointed under contract to be portfolio manager or investment adviser.
Investors must be protected from unexpected and undesired changes in the purpose and practices of their chosen investment vehicle. Regulations therefore impose both a fiduciary responsibility and prescriptive rules on the operators of mutual funds to ensure there are no unauthorised or imprudent dealings.
Normally, investment is restricted to transferable securities that are listed on a recognised stock exchange, and, for funds that are to be marketed to the general public, investment in gold, oil, sugar and other physical commodities is generally not permitted but investment in property may be. The regulations usually reflect the general principles of collective investment, which are that the fund and its management should have the following characteristics: Read the rest of this entry »
