A major defence industry supplier, Death Mines plc, wishes to borrow £1 million for twelve years at a fixed interest rate to finance a new investment project. It could do so by issuing a straight eurobond but, as it is not well known in the market and does not have a high credit risk rating, would have to pay a coupon of 8 per cent which it regards as too high. The firm’s own bank is willing to lend Death Mines the required amount via a one-year floating rate note at a rate of 2 per cent over LIBOR, currently at 3.6 per cent.
Clearly, the floating rate loan is much cheaper at the moment, but LIBOR could easily rise over the period of the loan to such a level that Death Mines would finish up losing on the project. Thus, it enters into a contract with a swap bank, Border International, to pay to it 5 per cent on the principal, receiving in exchange LIBOR.
The position of Death Mines now is:
Pays to its own bank LIBOR + 2 per cent
Pays to Border 5 per cent
Receives from Border LIBOR
Net position — fixed rate loan at 7 per cent Read the rest of this entry »
The trade press within the industry where the commodity is important fans the fires of demand. Insiders begin to speculate. Word spreads to the financial community and press quickly. Sooner or later, the mass media carries a story. That’s when the average investor bids for a piece of the action, which usually signals a blow-off top. Prices crash.
At several points along the rocky road from bust to boom and back again, excellent trading opportunities present themselves. A technical trader watching a flat or stagnant price chart notices a slight uptrend. Perhaps the long-term downtrend line drawn earlier on the chart was penetrated. Or it might be a fundamental trader with informed contacts within the industry in question who hears talk of shortages, sees inventories decline, or notices price movements. This stimulates him or her to call some distributors, check import-export data, shipments, etc.—all the links in the chain from production to end use. Read the rest of this entry »
You need to be concerned with the psychological aspects of investing in a managed futures program from two distinct points of view. First, what type of investment best meets your needs? And second, if you’re going to personally interview and select a CTA, what psychological characteristics should you be looking for?
The type of futures investment you are suited for depends on your attitude toward risk. If you are an aggressive risk-taker, you might be looking for an emerging CTA with a short, but incredible, track record. A moderate risk-taker might select a seasoned trader with a five- to ten-year track record in the moderate volatility range. Safety-conscious investors prefer to define their maximum risk in advance. They look for limited partnerships and “guaranteed” funds. We’ll have a discussion of the various types of offerings later in this text. Read the rest of this entry »
There are two ways that a swap position can be interpreted: (1) as a package of forward/ futures contracts, and (2) as a package of cash flows from buying and selling cash market instruments.
Package of Forward Contracts Consider the hypothetical interest-rate swap described earlier to illustrate a swap. Let’s look at party X’s position. Party X has agreed to pay 10% and receive six-month LIBOR. More specifically, assuming a $50 million notional principal amount, X has agreed to buy a commodity called six-month LIBOR for $2.5 million This is effectively a six-month forward contract in which X agrees to pay $2.5 million in exchange for delivery of six-month LIBOR. If interest rates increase to 11%, the price of that commodity (six-month LIBOR) is higher, resulting in a gain for the fixed-rate payer, who is effectively long a six-month forward contract on six-month LIBOR. The floating-rate payer is effectively short a six- month forward contract on six-month LIBOR. There is therefore an implicit forward contract corresponding to each exchange date. Read the rest of this entry »
An investor who lends funds by purchasing a bond issue is exposed to three types of credit risk: (1) default risk, (2) credit spread risk, and (3) downgrade risk.
Traditionally, credit risk is defined as the risk that the issuer will fail to satisfy the terms of the obligation with respect to the timely payment of interest and repayment of the amount borrowed. This form of credit risk is called default risk. If a default does occur, this does not mean the investor loses the entire amount invested because the investor can expect to recover a portion of the investment. Read the rest of this entry »
Is your advisor or broker honest with you about his motivation and how he is compensated? Beware of brokers who try and sell you that their superior performance and low annual fees will more than compensate you for a 5 percent upfront charge. You should not pay a load or sales charge when buying a mutual fund, but people routinely do.
Similarly, steer clear of advisors who use “soft dollar” commissions to pay for their bills. These commissions encourage advisors to trade your account and create more revenue for their firms. Finally, run from brokers and advisors who push their own in-house funds. They are given incentives to push these funds without regard to their fees or performance. This doesn’t mean that all in-house funds are bad, only that these brokers and advisors are not always considering if they’re the best investments for you.
Sloth can cause you to give any of these advisors a pass or fail to realize what they’re up to. You may also lust after advisors with great reputations and who offer promises of incredible performance, overlooking their fees or questionable tactics. The best way to honor your financial advisor is by choosing one whose only fee is based on a fixed percentage of the assets you have under management and evaluate this individual based on comparisons with a reasonable benchmark. Read the rest of this entry »
When your neighbor, friend, relative, or colleague makes a bundle through investing, remind yourself to manage the envy you naturally feel. If you don’t manage this envy, you’re likely to copy his strategy or type of investment. It’s possible (though unlikely) that copying it may be effective in the short-term, but it is no way to meet long-term objectives.
Viewed without any context or history, a buddy’s great investment is not always what it appears. He may have been investing in food-related companies for years without much success, but he happened to be holding one food company stock that shot skyward because of some hugely successful product introduction. You are not privy to the years of futility as he pursued this approach; all you see is that a food company investment paid off handsomely. If you try and duplicate his “strategy,” you’re doing so without seeing the whole picture. If you possessed this broader perspective, you would never attempt to use his flawed approach.
Diminish your fervor to copy other successful tactics and techniques by asking your neighbor or colleague the following questions: How long have you had this particular investment? How has it done over the last three years? Have you ever had a similarly spectacular success in the past ten years? Have you been disappointed by your investing approach over the last five years? How were you disappointed? The answers are likely to make you less covetous.
Certain types of investing seem to trigger anger in certain investors, and if you’re vulnerable to this sin, you should do everything possible to avoid these types. Specifically, don’t:
-
SEEK HIGHLY VOLATILE, MICROCAP STOCK INVESTMENTS
Read the rest of this entry »
For all the seven sins, the goal is to keep your emotions in check when making investment decisions, but it is especially important here. Anger flares up faster than any of the other sins and it can be so powerful that before you know it, you’ve made an ill-advised investment. Besides the previous recommendations, here are some proactive steps that can keep Your anger out of the process:
- FORCE YOURSELF TO TAKE BREAKS FROM THE INVESTMENT WORLD IN GENERAL AND YOUR PORTFOLIO IN PARTICULAR
The more you immerse yourself in an investing mindset, the angrier you’re likely to get, especially if things aren’t going your way. Rubbing your nose in your own mistakes or the market’s unpleasant surprises for hours every day will just raise your hackles. As a long-term investor, you don’t need to be tracking your stocks nonstop or be up on every market development. While I strongly advocate being aware of events that have an impact on your portfolio, you can maintain this awareness by monitoring it every few days or by spending just a little time on it daily. Reducing your exposure to the investing world will reduce your aggravation. You will be less likely to blow your stack or your investment dollars from the accumulated pain associated with nonstop market monitoring. Read the rest of this entry »
Gluttons are addicts, only instead of being hooked on food they cravethe action of trading. While people who eat a lot may grow large, people who invest a lot often see their portfolios shrink. This type of investor sells bad stocks in the hope of finding good ones and sells good performers in the hope of finding better ones. Read the rest of this entry »
Some investors experience significant losses but take counterproductive actions in the wake of these losses. Rather than becoming aware of how their sins created their investing woes, they allow sloth and pride to cloud their vision, shielding them from the truth about the mistakes they have made. Read the rest of this entry »
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
The primary purpose of regulations is to protect investors, and the roots of governmental regulation of mutual funds in the longer-established markets are often associated with major scandals and market crashes.
In the USA, the stock market crash of 1929 prompted an extensive investigation by Congress into the securities industry. It revealed that overselling, or ‘ramming’ of shares, particularly radio company shares, had created unrealistic expectations and false, overvalued markets. The investigation resulted finally in the Investment Company Act 1940, which established the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) - this Act remains the cornerstone of US mutual fund regulation - and the Investment Advisers Act 1940. Along with two Acts passed into Federal law in the 1930s - the Securities Act 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act 2934 - these four Acts provide the bulk of federal powers over the activities of US investment companies. In fact, the only addition to US legislation affecting all companies since 1940 is the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and that has only an indirect bearing on mutual funds themselves, being more concerned with accounting, auditing and disclosure practices of trading companies, following the Enron and Worldcom scandals. Read the rest of this entry »
Mutual funds are used by private investors and by institutions for different but overlapping reasons
Private investors use mutual funds to invest money in the hope that it will:
- grow in value, or
- provide income, or
- deliver both, i.e.. capital growth and income either to serve specific financial needs, now or in the future, or simply to enhance their prospect of wealth.
Institutions, particularly life companies and pensions funds, use mutual funds as a convenient way to organise and manage some if not all of their investment portfolios, which will have objectives similar to those of the private investors who are the ultimate beneficiaries. Read the rest of this entry »
