In determining which specific closed-end fund provides the best buying opportunity, it might appear that the process is exceptionally simple: Just see which one is selling at the widest discount and buy it.
Unfortunately, the process is a bit more complicated. As previously discussed, there are valid reasons for discounts. There is also a wide variety of fund types: equity (stocks in general or in industrial sectors), bonds (different types, such as municipal, corporate, foreign, or U.S. government; all with varying maturities), convertible bonds (combining both bond and stock characteristics), specialty (confining interest to a specific country, a very narrow industry sector, venture capital, or specific private placements), dual-purpose (where the fund seeks both capital gains and income), or anything else that can generate public interest and enough sales to capitalize the fund. Read the rest of this entry »
A eurobond is a debt security handled internationally by syndicates, groups of bankers and/or brokers who underwrite and distribute new issues of securities or large blocks of outstanding issues. It is typically in bearer (non-registered form) and is issued outside the country of the currency in which it is denominated.
Borrowers and lenders are spread around the world, while the intermediaries are spread across Europe, with the majority of business being done from London. The market was founded in the early 1960s and has provided a competitive source of funding for borrowers who can tap discreet but important sources of finance. Japanese banks, pension funds and insurance companies have become important lenders in recent years and there are still plenty of wealthy individuals who prefer the anonymity offered by bearer securities. The eurobond market is the world’s second largest securities market after the US bond market in terms of trading volume and the third largest after the US and Japanese bond markets in terms of debt outstanding. Read the rest of this entry »
A collateralized debt obligation (CDO) is backed by a diversified pool of one or more types of debt obligations (e.g., U.S. domestic investment-grade corporate bonds, high-yield corporate bonds, emerging market bonds, bank loans, asset-backed securities, and residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities). The funds to purchase the collateral assets are obtained from the issuance of bonds. There is a collateral manager responsible for managing the collateral of assets.
A CDO is classified as a cash CDO or a synthetic CDO. The adjective “cash” means that the collateral manager purchases cash market instruments. A synthetic CDO is so named because the collateral manager does not actually own the pool of assets on which it has the credit risk exposure. Stated differently, a synthetic CDO absorbs the credit risk, but not the legal ownership, of the reference obligations. A credit default swap allows institutions to transfer the credit risk, but not the legal ownership, of the reference obligations it may own. Read the rest of this entry »
One issue that has elicited different responses is the role of currency risk in overall risk and return. Currency risk has been accounted for in all of the evidence presented. So the existence of currency risk will not reduce the benefits of investing in foreign markets. Rather, the question is whether managing currency risk will improve the gains from international investing.
While the reduction of any kind of risk is good, there are two issues that must be considered with regard to currency risk. First, the correlation between currency risk and stock market risk is close to zero. That means that currency changes and stock returns are independent of one another. Though both currency risk and stock market risk contribute to the total risk of a portfolio of foreign stocks, the contribution of currency risk to the total risk is not very large because of the zero correlation. On average, currency risk contributes less than 20 percent of the total risk. Read the rest of this entry »
There are several reasons for the persistence of the forward rate bias. Arbitrageurs or other smart traders may not be able to trade on the forward rate bias due to transaction costs and risk of taking positions. Second, arbitrageurs may be wary of the forward rate bias due to the absence of a logical explanation. Third, limits on arbitrage exist, as currency markets are very large. Finally, the forward rate bias will continue to persist probably due to the structure of currency markets. Each reason for persistence is discussed in turn.
There is general consensus based on the evidence presented above that the forward rate is biased and a poor predictor of the future spot rate. Read the rest of this entry »
Nearly all of the mutual fund families offer multiple funds that are geared toward international investing. The different kinds of funds can be categorized into index funds, international funds, regional funds, country funds, emerging market funds, and global funds. International mutual funds have higher expense ratios than domestic mutual funds to cover higher trading costs and higher management fees. The funds also tend to have redemption fees to control frequent trading. Examples of funds offered by major mutual fund companies are given below.
* Index funds. These include Fidelity Spartan International Index Fund, Vanguard Developed Markets Stock Index, Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index, and Price International Equity Index Fund.
* International funds. These funds do not invest in the domestic market. Funds include Fidelity International Growth, T. Rowe Price International, Fidelity Overseas, Vanguard International Growth, Fidelity Diversified International, and so on.
* Global funds. These funds invest in all countries, including the domestic market, and include Templeton World, GT Global Worldwide, Dreyfus Global, Vanguard Global Equity, Price Global Stock, and so on. Read the rest of this entry »
The Problem
Since the beginning of 1997, the U.S.-sold Japan Fund has experienced substantial cash inflows and outflows from investors, and portfolio manager David Smith has voiced his concern recently about the volatility. He also noted that extremely large shareholder orders seem to coincide more and more with news affecting Japan, and cash flow management is taking up a large percentage of his time that might otherwise be spent selecting securities.
Smith suspects some shareholders are trying to increase their profits by “timing” the market—quickly moving their money from one fund to another within the complex. Furthermore, he speculates that these investors might be attempting to profit from the methodology that the fund complex uses to compute the daily NAV of the fund by trading on stock price information that may become available between the time when the Japanese markets close and the time the fund values its holdings. Read the rest of this entry »
In addition, the composition of equity funds changed during the 1990-2000 period. According to Strategic Insight, broader investment objectives such as growth and growth & income experienced a decrease of 7.7 percentage points in share of equity funds during the decade. The decrease was offset by an increase in more specialized funds, with higher management fees, such as sector funds and international funds. In particular, emerging market and country funds went from a half-percent share of funds 110P available in 1990 to almost 3% in 2000. At the same time, there was a substantial increase in lower management fee products such as index funds, which were almost nonexistent in 1989.
2. Number of funds During the 1990s, fund choices grew alongside assets at a rapid pace as the number of mutual funds increased from around 3,000 to over 8,000.
Implications of this tremendous increase in the number of funds for management fees depend on the resulting trends in average and median fund size, as shown in Table 2 (which defines a fund to include each class of a multi-class fund). Read the rest of this entry »
E. Recent Improvements
Notwithstanding the difficulties outlined above, many U.S. institutional investors attempt to exercise their voting rights in many markets around the world. As in the United States, mutual fund complexes are rarely activist overseas, although an institution may become involved when fundamental factors affecting the value of its investments are at issue. Indeed, as their foreign holdings increase in size, institutional investors have recently become more successful in certain situations in asserting their rights as shareholders. For example, in 1997, institutional investors in the French company Eramet, including Fidelity Investments and TIAA-CREF, successfully forced the company to abandon a politically motivated and financially damaging plan to dispose of assets engineered by the French government, its majority shareholder. Read the rest of this entry »
Is your advisor or broker honest with you about his motivation and how he is compensated? Beware of brokers who try and sell you that their superior performance and low annual fees will more than compensate you for a 5 percent upfront charge. You should not pay a load or sales charge when buying a mutual fund, but people routinely do.
Similarly, steer clear of advisors who use “soft dollar” commissions to pay for their bills. These commissions encourage advisors to trade your account and create more revenue for their firms. Finally, run from brokers and advisors who push their own in-house funds. They are given incentives to push these funds without regard to their fees or performance. This doesn’t mean that all in-house funds are bad, only that these brokers and advisors are not always considering if they’re the best investments for you.
Sloth can cause you to give any of these advisors a pass or fail to realize what they’re up to. You may also lust after advisors with great reputations and who offer promises of incredible performance, overlooking their fees or questionable tactics. The best way to honor your financial advisor is by choosing one whose only fee is based on a fixed percentage of the assets you have under management and evaluate this individual based on comparisons with a reasonable benchmark. Read the rest of this entry »
To help you manage the three secondary sins just mentioned as well as the seven major ones, I’ve put together a list of ten things you should and should not do. They compliment the sins, in that they are action items as opposed to “warnings.” Just as the ten commandments of biblical fame suggest ways to avoid the seven sins, these commandments function in a similar manner. Keeping a list of these commandments handy next to a list of the sins should provide you with the model you need to maintain your virtuous investment path.
Let’s look at each commandment and how to obey it:
- Thou shall not convert thy neighbor’s investment
- Thou shall not make a killing
- Know thy investments better than thou know thyself
- Thou shall not make unto thee a graven image of profits
- Thou shall not take the name of the Lord in vain or issue nay foul-tempered oaths while investing
- Thou shall not commit adultery chasing some thy little stock of the moment
- Honor they mother, thy father, and the market in good times and bad
- Thou shall not steal from thyself by forgetting about taxes
- Thou shall not worship false idols or deceitful financial advisors
Greed is one of the most difficult sins to manage because it is always there. We invest to make money, and every promising investment raises the possibility of making a significant amount of money. We wouldn’t be human if part of us didn’t dream a bit about what might be. Good investors, though, keep that part of themselves in a controlled, isolated environment. If you are particularly vulnerable to the sin of greed, you’ll do likewise. Specifically, you’ll do some or all of the following:
- Invest slowly, knowledgably, and logically. Speed, ignorance, and reflex are the greedy investor’s enemies. Force yourself to move relatively slowly before making an investing decision, even when you’re certain that even a moment’s delay could cost you thousands. In the vast majority of cases, delaying your decision for a short period of time won’t hurt. In most instances, it helps because it gives you a bigger window of time in which you can think, reflect, learn, and talk about an investment. Greed preys on people who just react. When I say invest knowledgably, I mean do your homework. Learn about the fund’s or stock’s performance historically. Compare the fund or stock to the appropriate index or benchmark. Read as many reports as you can related to the investment. Don’t worry that your delay makes you spend an extra 50 cents a share because in the long run it won’t make a difference. Finally, logical investing means reasoning out your investment decision. When you hear a great tip or read something that makes you believe you’ve found a great fund that will make you millions, step back and write down the logical steps that have led you to this conclusion. Specifically:
Read the rest of this entry »
As you’re reading this, you may think to yourself, “I’m never going to commit this sin.” Everyone thinks this thought. When you’re reading about other people, their lustful investing behavior seems completely irrational. In the heat of investment decision-making, however, lust can hit you when you least expect it. Certain situations present themselves and rational thought takes a back seat to the moment’s infatuation. It pays, therefore, to be alert for the following situations where you’re most vulnerable to lustful investing:
There are all sorts of direct and indirect messages that make you feel your company stock is going to perform better than any other stock. You observe that your organization is extremely well-managed, that the company has great products and services and that its leaders are inspirational and honest. As our WorldCom example illustrated, it is not unusual for people to invest their entire retirement funds in their own company stock. You may receive stock options and other incentives to buy the company stock, and your boss or some other executive may assure you that it’s the best investment you could possibly make. In some cases, management may apply pressure for you to invest in the company and they may monitor your equity holdings. For some people, it feels disloyal to invest in any other company’s stock.
If this describes your investing, I don’t want to suggest that you’ve been brainwashed, but you certainly have been smitten. Why else would you entrust your livelihood and your life savings to one company? As great as your company’s management may be, people change companies. As wonderful as your company’s products are, new products with new technologies render established products obsolete. Read the rest of this entry »
Lazy and indifferent investors need to force themselves to pay attention to their investments. If they just tell themselves that they’ll try and pay more attention, they are likely to fail. Typically, a slothful investor will experience an investing loss and vow to pay more attention and become more diligent. He may even make an effort to do so for a while, but the odds are that he’ll slip back into his old behaviors if his investments return to their normal performance. Investing laziness is a habit that’s tough to break, which is why my recommendation is to establish a new routine.
Here are the behaviors that you should incorporate into this routine:
1. SET UP AN E-MAIL ALERT
If you are managing your money yourself and buying individual stocks, this e-mail alert will automatically and regularly provide you with the earnings release of the companies you own. I monitor my personal holdings through a Yahoo! Finance page that tracks all my stocks and allows me to view headlines and news stories from the Wall Street Journal, Dow Jones, and other financial publications. Read the rest of this entry »
For all the seven sins, the goal is to keep your emotions in check when making investment decisions, but it is especially important here. Anger flares up faster than any of the other sins and it can be so powerful that before you know it, you’ve made an ill-advised investment. Besides the previous recommendations, here are some proactive steps that can keep Your anger out of the process:
- FORCE YOURSELF TO TAKE BREAKS FROM THE INVESTMENT WORLD IN GENERAL AND YOUR PORTFOLIO IN PARTICULAR
The more you immerse yourself in an investing mindset, the angrier you’re likely to get, especially if things aren’t going your way. Rubbing your nose in your own mistakes or the market’s unpleasant surprises for hours every day will just raise your hackles. As a long-term investor, you don’t need to be tracking your stocks nonstop or be up on every market development. While I strongly advocate being aware of events that have an impact on your portfolio, you can maintain this awareness by monitoring it every few days or by spending just a little time on it daily. Reducing your exposure to the investing world will reduce your aggravation. You will be less likely to blow your stack or your investment dollars from the accumulated pain associated with nonstop market monitoring. Read the rest of this entry »
Gluttons are addicts, only instead of being hooked on food they cravethe action of trading. While people who eat a lot may grow large, people who invest a lot often see their portfolios shrink. This type of investor sells bad stocks in the hope of finding good ones and sells good performers in the hope of finding better ones. Read the rest of this entry »
- for mortgage repayment a low-risk investment would
- be sensible, but, if the term is long enough, greater
- risk could be taken in the early years;
- similarly for pension or retirement provision; greater risk can be taken when the investor is young;
- if saving to provide a’start in life’ for children, lowto-meditun risk funds should perhaps be chosen;
- if investing a windfall, such as a legacy, a relatively high risk might be acceptable, on the basis that the funds arose unexpectedly, although hopefully without being reckless.
Read the rest of this entry »
