Despite the huge growth of mutual funds, the marked shift in fund types and the creation of new distribution channels, the concentration of market share within the fund management industry remained remarkably stable during the 1990s. The industry has continued to be led by 10 fund managers with 45% to 55% of all mutual fund assets under management and 25 managers with 70% to 75% of all mutual fund assets under management. But many of the leaders changed places over the decade—some because of strong performances and others due to mergers and acquisitions. At the same time, the number of fund complexes overall has continued to increase as new fund managers have taken advantage of the mutual fund industry’s low barriers to entry.
1. Overall industry concentration and turnover In 1990, there were 464 mutual fund complexes, of which the top 10 managed 56% of total industry assets and the top 25 managed 76% of total assets. By the end of 2000, the mutual fund industry was modestly less concentrated at the top. There were 654 complexes at that date, with the top 10 accounting for 46% of total assets and the top 2, accounting for 71% of total assets.The list of top 25 fund complexes has changed significantly, with some complexes dropping out and others stepping in. Read the rest of this entry »
The Class B structure creates challenging financial issues for the fund sponsor This structure carries inherent risk in that the fund’s NAV could decline substantially, decreasing the amount of 126-1 fees and CDSCs received by the sponsor, possibly below the amount it advanced to the broker-dealer. This is especially a risk for an equity fund sponsor, since equity assets are more volatile than other asset types. In recent years, many fund sponsors have sought relief from the risk that the CDSC arrangement entails by taking advantage of new methods of financial engineering developed by banks and investment banks. These methods enable fund sponsors to reduce or eliminate this risk by securitizing and selling the future cash flows from 12b-1 fees and CDSCs. For example, consider a fund sponsor that has just paid a broker a 4% commission for selling Class B shares of a growth find. Rather than wait to recoup this commission via 12b-1 fees and/or CDSCs, the sponsor may sell the rights to these future cash flows to an unrelated party in exchange for a modestly lower payment today. This sale effectively protects the sponsor against the risk associated with a possible downturn in the equities market and consequential decline in cash flows from 12b-1 fees and CDSCs. Read the rest of this entry »
In addition, the composition of equity funds changed during the 1990-2000 period. According to Strategic Insight, broader investment objectives such as growth and growth & income experienced a decrease of 7.7 percentage points in share of equity funds during the decade. The decrease was offset by an increase in more specialized funds, with higher management fees, such as sector funds and international funds. In particular, emerging market and country funds went from a half-percent share of funds 110P available in 1990 to almost 3% in 2000. At the same time, there was a substantial increase in lower management fee products such as index funds, which were almost nonexistent in 1989.
2. Number of funds During the 1990s, fund choices grew alongside assets at a rapid pace as the number of mutual funds increased from around 3,000 to over 8,000.
Implications of this tremendous increase in the number of funds for management fees depend on the resulting trends in average and median fund size, as shown in Table 2 (which defines a fund to include each class of a multi-class fund). Read the rest of this entry »
1. Asset growth In 1990, the mutual fund industry was a relatively small industry among financial intermediaries, with just over $1 trillion in assets, or 12% of the total sector (see Table 1). By contrast, depository institutions had almost five times the assets, or 56% of the sector (of which commercial banks accounted for $3.3 trillion or 38%, and assets of life insurance companies equaled $1.4 trillion or 16%).
By the end of the 1990s, the mutual fund industry had become a major player among financial intermediaries, with almost $7 trillion in assets and 39% of the overall sector. Although mutual fund assets slightly lagged those of all depository institutions taken as a whole-at $7.6 trillion, Read the rest of this entry »
Over the past few years, the merger activity in the mutual fund industry has sharply accelerated. Some of the mergers involved fund companies trying to fill out their line of products. An illustration is the acquisition of Templeton’s management company, which has a strong reputation for international stock funds, by Franklin’s management company, with its heavy emphasis on bond funds. Other mergers involved institutionally oriented securities firms seeking more distribution to retail investors. An illustration is the acquisition of Dean Witter, a retail wire house, by Morgan Stanley, with its institutional client base. Still others involve banks that want to gain a foothold in the mutual fund industry. An illustration is the acquisition of Dreyfus, an investment manager for a broad line of mutual funds, by Mellon National Bank. The following case study discusses several mergers in the mutual fund industry and the early results of the consolidations. Read the rest of this entry »
James M. Clash
A wave of consolidation is washing over the mutual fund business. So far this year funds totaling more than $125 billion in assets have changed hands. To hear the consolidators tell it, mergers are good because they bring fund investors economies of scale and breadth of choice within a fund family. Will these promises be fulfilled? It is instructive to consider some of the bigger recent mergers. The results are not encouraging.
Take the Dreyfus funds, purchased in December 1993 by Pittsburgh’s Mellon Bank. In the three years before the merger, the 12 domestic stock funds at Dreyfus performed, on average, on a par with the S&P 500 index. In the three years since, these funds, on average, have underperformed the index by a stunning seven percentage points a year.
Then there’s the American Capital/Van Kampen merger in August 1994. In the 26 months prior to the marriage, the 11 stock funds here outperformed the S&P 500 index by an average of two points annually. In the 26 months since the merger, the funds have underperformed, Read the rest of this entry »
Are you actively looking for the next Dell? Do you want to find a stock that is under $1 a share (as Dell was, split adjusted, prior to 1996) and ride it to $50 (which Dell reached in 2000)? If this is what your goal is, you are better off studying gambling techniques and visiting a casino. Trying to make a killing causes you to invest in stocks that carry a lot of risk and that have relatively low odds of rewarding the risks you take.
If you feel the urge to make a killing and you’re particularly vulnerable to sins such as greed and gluttony, here is a good way to follow this commandment. Tell yourself that if you want to make a killing, rather than searching for a rags-to-riches stock, your money would be better spent by taking a risk on:
- Opening a restaurant
- Starting an Internet grocery store
- Buying real estate
- Buying swamp land in Zimbabwe
I’m not suggesting you actually do these things, only that you should consider them and then realize how much risk is involved in trying to make a killing in the market.
To help you manage the three secondary sins just mentioned as well as the seven major ones, I’ve put together a list of ten things you should and should not do. They compliment the sins, in that they are action items as opposed to “warnings.” Just as the ten commandments of biblical fame suggest ways to avoid the seven sins, these commandments function in a similar manner. Keeping a list of these commandments handy next to a list of the sins should provide you with the model you need to maintain your virtuous investment path.
Let’s look at each commandment and how to obey it:
- Thou shall not convert thy neighbor’s investment
- Thou shall not make a killing
- Know thy investments better than thou know thyself
- Thou shall not make unto thee a graven image of profits
- Thou shall not take the name of the Lord in vain or issue nay foul-tempered oaths while investing
- Thou shall not commit adultery chasing some thy little stock of the moment
- Honor they mother, thy father, and the market in good times and bad
- Thou shall not steal from thyself by forgetting about taxes
- Thou shall not worship false idols or deceitful financial advisors
As you read through the descriptions of the sins and the accompanying monologues, it’s likely that you had an inkling of the ones to which you are most vulnerable. You may have found one or more than one, seeing your own investing behaviors in the descriptions. While it’s important to be aware of all seven sins—most of us fall victim to all of them during the course of an investing lifetime—pinpointing the sins that are most likely to hurt your investing performance is key. To help in doing this, I keep a journal of my trading activity. In the journal, I note where and when I first heard of a particular company, what research I did into it, the reasons behind my decision to buy it (or not buy it), why I sold it, and so on.
To help you pinpoint your vulnerabilities, I’m going to list some common investing mistakes and the specific sins that catalyze these mistakes. As you’ll see, more than one sin can cause some mistakes, so you won’t always find a one-on-one relationship between mistake and sin. Still, this exercise will help you hone in on your vulnerabilities, narrowing the list down from seven to one, two, or three. Read the rest of this entry »
For all the seven sins, the goal is to keep your emotions in check when making investment decisions, but it is especially important here. Anger flares up faster than any of the other sins and it can be so powerful that before you know it, you’ve made an ill-advised investment. Besides the previous recommendations, here are some proactive steps that can keep Your anger out of the process:
- FORCE YOURSELF TO TAKE BREAKS FROM THE INVESTMENT WORLD IN GENERAL AND YOUR PORTFOLIO IN PARTICULAR
The more you immerse yourself in an investing mindset, the angrier you’re likely to get, especially if things aren’t going your way. Rubbing your nose in your own mistakes or the market’s unpleasant surprises for hours every day will just raise your hackles. As a long-term investor, you don’t need to be tracking your stocks nonstop or be up on every market development. While I strongly advocate being aware of events that have an impact on your portfolio, you can maintain this awareness by monitoring it every few days or by spending just a little time on it daily. Reducing your exposure to the investing world will reduce your aggravation. You will be less likely to blow your stack or your investment dollars from the accumulated pain associated with nonstop market monitoring. Read the rest of this entry »
Australia - the first unit trust to be offered in Australia was named just that - Hugh Dalton’s Australian Fixed Trusts offering units in the First Australian Unit Trust in late 1936, when the funds industry was largely unregulated. The Australian retail funds market is now fully regulated under the provisions of the Managed Investments Act (MIA) and, more recently, the Financial Services Reform Act of 2001, which changed the licens ing and disclosure requirements. The MIA requires managers to take on the duties and obligations of the single responsible entity, whereby they are obligated under statute law to uphold unitholder rights. Under this arrangement, trustee duties have been fused with manager duties, but whilst external custody is not mandatory, the majority of managers use independent custodian services. Superannuation funds also gain the regulatory protection of the MIA, as approximately 90% of these savings are invested in wholesale and retail MIA vehicles. Read the rest of this entry »
Investors should routinely review the performance of their investment in a mutual fund; there are, however, some factors that need to be considered and understood, as regards both the preparation and the use of statistics. The most readily available performance statistics are compiled to generate a’league table’ based upon the value of an investment after given time periods since the date of initially investing a particular sum of money, say 1,000.
The numbers are calculated assuming the initial investment is made at the buying, or offer, price and the number of shares thus acquired are valued at the current selling, or bid, price. To avoid distortions caused by different patterns of income, the numbers are adjusted on the assumption that any income entitlement is reinvested at each date during the period when the fund made an income distribution. This overall approach is cited as being on the basis of ‘offer to bid, income reinvested’. Read the rest of this entry »
Institutions obtain administrative and, sometimes, taxation benefits by using mutual funds to manage their own assets. Such funds are invariably not available to the general public. Funds that are authorised to be promoted to the general public (frequently referred to as ‘retail funds‘), usually extol the benefits to the private individual, namely:
1. Small investment required
Although both minimum holdings and minimum initial amounts are usually required, individuals can invest comparatively small sums of money in mutual funds, particularly through plans that accept regular subscriptions. So-called ’small investors‘ can thereby obtain the benefits of worldwide economic activity (hopefully growth) rather than allowing these to be enjoyed by the banks (and their shareholders) and others with whom they deposit their funds in return for an interest income. Read the rest of this entry »
Once a mutual fund is authorized, it is launched to potential investors by way of an initial offer of shares or units at a fixed price. The terms of the offer are restricted by regulations, which cover matters such as how long the initial offer period may last and the circumstances that require it to close.
The fund or its management company may set a minimum and a maximum target of capital to be raised, and the prospectus must explain what will happen if those targets are not reached or are exceeded.
The launch is usually accomplished by making announcements in the press, mailings to prospective investors, launch briefings for advisers and agents, and advertisements. Although not permitted in the US, some countries allow advertisements to solicit money ‘off the page’ by inclusion of an application form. Nowadays, this extends to advertising and making investment via the Internet. Read the rest of this entry »
