Measuring Discounts/Premiums
Posted on March 15th, 2008 in Benevolent Funds, Bond Funds, Consolidated Funds, Country Specific Funds, Emerging Markets Funds, General Funds, Hedge Funds, Mutual Funds |
In determining which specific closed-end fund provides the best buying opportunity, it might appear that the process is exceptionally simple: Just see which one is selling at the widest discount and buy it.
Unfortunately, the process is a bit more complicated. As previously discussed, there are valid reasons for discounts. There is also a wide variety of fund types: equity (stocks in general or in industrial sectors), bonds (different types, such as municipal, corporate, foreign, or U.S. government; all with varying maturities), convertible bonds (combining both bond and stock characteristics), specialty (confining interest to a specific country, a very narrow industry sector, venture capital, or specific private placements), dual-purpose (where the fund seeks both capital gains and income), or anything else that can generate public interest and enough sales to capitalize the fund.
One way to simplify the process of deciding which funds to buy is to determine an “average” premium/discount over an extended period and then determine the degree of discounting at any given time by comparing the current discount to the average discount.
For example, let’s say we are looking at two funds. Fund A is selling at a 10-percent discount and its average discount is also 10 percent. Fund B is selling at an 8-percent discount, but its average is 4 percent. The gross discount of Fund A is greater than Fund B (10 percent versus 8 percent). Fund B, however, would represent the better purchase based on its past because it is 4 percent below its average discount, while Fund A is not below the past average discount. All other factors being equal, Fund B would be preferable because normalization to the average discount would involve capital appreciation, whereas Fund A is already normalized to its past average.
The length of time utilized to determine the average past discount depends on investor preference. We use a rather lengthy time period (usually four years for funds that have been in existence that long), using discounts on a weekly basis. That is, the discount at the end of each week for the past 208 weeks is added up and then divided by 208, thereby deriving the average. When the next week’s discount is added, the oldest past week is subtracted, as in any other moving average.
The average discount calculation need not be as lengthy as the one we use. Yet an extended period is generally helpful because many funds come to market when there is a speculative binge and the fund’s structure (investment types) appeals to emotionalism. This effect was clearly evident during the rage in the late 1980s for single-country funds. Once sold to the public, the funds often traded at very high premiums before settling to discounts. Using a short time period to determine the average discount could give the initial impression that these funds would always sell at a premium when, in fact, after they were “seasoned,” the premiums went poof.
We have attempted to provide only a very general outline of closed-end fund characteristics, just enough to apply our analytical techniques to closed-end funds.
Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)
Measuring Discounts/Premiums
- Premium/Discount Functions
- Continuous Full Investment with Hedging continue...
- Closed-End Funds continue...
- Applying Specific Market Timing and Selection Techniques to Closed-End Funds
- Why Discounts Exist?
- Profile of Fund Managers Part 1
- Types of Credit Risk
- Get Inside: Possible Mispricings?! (continue...)
- Bond Funds
- Continuous Full Investment with Hedging
4 Responses
Secondly, the proposed bills would not have sufficiently lowered the price of prescription drugs to the consumer. … Amortizable Bond Premiums
SITE reserves the right to withhold account balances on the blocked account(s) indefinitely and to confiscate all funds. … Download Security Prices
The bill’ s backers acknowledge that it does not improve the financial outlook of Social Security, which is expected to run a surplus only until around 2017. … Finspire Capital
Another indication that mortgage rates will not rise this year.Economists also say the Federal Reserve will not raise federal funds rates beyond 3 per?Cent by the end of 2005, due to the rise in oil prices, the war in Iraq and terrorist threats. … Second Rates